Laserfiche WebLink
Memorandum - Schilling Consultant Services <br />Disadvantages <br />Each local government within VLAWMO would identify those parcels within the newly established watershed <br />management tax district(s) for determining the levy amount equal for its share of the proposed WMO budget. <br />This presumably is a one -time cost once parcels are set -up in a file. However, Ramsey County requires an <br />administrative fee of $5.00 per parcel. Thus for example, if the local government unit had 1000 parcels in the <br />watershed management tax district, an additional administrative fee of $5,000 would be paid to the County each <br />year. This is a similar requirement for special assessments under typical capital improvement projects authority <br />per M.S. Chapter 429, but typically these are one -time costs per parcel. <br />The above procedure also incurs additional VLAWMO administrative costs to assure that each local <br />government is levying the right amount of taxes each year to achieve the requested VLAWMO budget amount. <br />Can a local unit of government use a stormwater utility as a funding source? <br />Yes and a number of local government units in the metropolitan area have established stormwater utilities, <br />including the City of Vadnais Heights under authority granted in M.S. 444.075. <br />Advantage <br />The stormwater utility is most equitable form of funding stormwater- related issues and in this case providing the <br />funding contribution to a WMO. While the local government unit could take its share for the WMO budget out <br />of its stormwater utility enterprise fund, again parcels would be double charged that are within another WMO. <br />To remove the double charging, the local government unit would need to establish a separate stormwater utility <br />district covering only that portion within the WMO. <br />Disadvantage <br />There would be an internal local government unit cost in setting up a separate parcel file for the WMO area, but <br />this would presumably be a one time cost. However, there would need to be additional work by the local <br />government unit every year to segregate only the WMO cost to be charged back to a given parcel. <br />While the stormwater utility is the most equitable method, it should be noted that some parcels might not have a <br />utility charge (e.g. open space, parcels without city sewer or water). <br />Can a WMO seek designation as a special taxing district for future funding source? <br />Yes, the water management organization may seek designation authority from the Minnesota Legislature as a <br />Special Taxing District under M.S. 275.066. Besides watershed districts and the Middle Mississippi River <br />Watershed Management Organization mentioned previously, counties are also special taxing districts. This <br />latter county authority only applies for those counties (Carver, Dakota and Scott) in the metropolitan area that <br />are conducting watershed planning for minor watersheds within their boundaries [M.S. 103B.245, Subd. 1(c) <br />and 103B.253]. <br />Essentially, a WMO acting as a special taxing district determines proposed annual expenditures for its budget. It <br />then determines the levy amount dependent upon the tax capacity of its legal area, sets the levy amount and <br />communicates it to the county for certification of payment. <br />Advantage <br />Short of the storm water utilities in each local government, a special taxing district method is the most equitable <br />approach as WMO budgets increase as a result of additional federal and state mandated programs to improve <br />water quality, fish and wildlife habitat. Each parcel is taxed in accordance with its location within that WMO. <br />01/09/2006 46 Bertha Ct., Mahtomedi, MN 55115 -2031 3 <br />