My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
10/11/2006 P&Z Minutes
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Board
>
Minutes
>
2006
>
10/11/2006 P&Z Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/7/2014 4:18:12 PM
Creation date
4/7/2014 4:18:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
P&Z
P&Z Document Type
P&Z Minutes
Meeting Date
10/11/2006
P&Z Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Planning&ZoningBoard <br />October11,2006 <br />Page 5 <br />APPROVED MINUTES <br />proper ties .Mr.Tschida add edthatonepropertyownerinCentervilleformerlypurchased <br />thepropertyfor$1.00.M r.Laden askedwhattheir purpose wasfor originally acquiring <br />theland.Mr.Tschida explainedthat thereisa pumpinCenterville L akea swellas the <br />damandthat own ingthe property wouldhelpthem tomanagetheflowofthelake. <br />Mr.Nelson madea MOTION to recommend approv alof theVariancesforRoad <br />Frontage,LotArea,LotWidth,andLotDepth ,forpropertiesa long Peltierand <br />CentervilleLakes asdescribedinthestaffreport .Motionwassupportedby Mr.Rafferty . <br />Motioncarried 6 -0. <br />E.PreliminaryPlatandVariancesforFrontSetbackandUplandAreaforFran’s <br />Estate,BirchStreet –discussiononly <br />Mr.Bengtsonpresentedthestaffrepor t andnotedthatthisitemwasbeingpresented <br />tonightfordiscussiononly asstaffwas stillintheprocessofreviewingrecently <br />submittedmaterialandwere notpreparedtomakearecommendationatthistime. <br />Staffnotedthat since preparingthestaffr eport,thesurveyor h asagreedtoworkwith <br />staff’sconcerns.Hesaidthatthes urveyorha dsubmitteda revisedPreliminaryPlat that <br />showed ashareddriveway,an easementbufferandrevisedbuildingpads. <br />Atthistime,staffisaskingtheboardforco mmentsontheissues presented . <br />Mr.Rafferty wasconcernedthatifthis variancerequestwasgranted,itcould potentially <br />setprecedence forfutureapplications.Headdedthatthisparcelis reallyonelotnottwo. <br />Mr.L adenaskedforclarificationof whattheintent is for the amountofuplandsquare <br />footageintheordinance .Mr.Bengtsonrepliedthat theintentisto provideenoughroom <br />forabuildablelot whileallowing forsetbackrequirementsfrom the buildingpad. <br />Mr.Nelsonasked if therevised plan includeda decreasedsetback .Mr.Bengtson replied <br />thatthenew plansshowasmallerbuildingpadtoallowforagreatersetbackarea. <br />Upondiscussion,boardmemberscommentedthatthepropertyisnotlargeenoughto <br />allowfortwohouseswiththe limitedamountofupland. <br />Mr.L aden wonderedifaduplexwouldfitwithinthedensity.Mr.Smyserstatedthatthe <br />ComprehensivePlanrestrictsR -2tomediumdens ity. <br />Boardmemberscommentedthatthe largepercentagevariancerequest wasexcessive. <br />Chu ckPlowe,PloweEngineering,6776LakeDr.,representingtheapplicant ,statedthata <br />lotofworkandresearch wasdone onthisproject ,includingworkingwiththe R iceCreek <br />WatershedDistrict.Mr.Ploweagreedthattherequestisforalargevarianceam ount,but <br />thatthe backlotline was notanissue.Henotedthata tonetimethecitydidanticipate <br />twolots,astherearetwosanitarysewerservicesinplace.Heexplainedthata tonetime <br />theselotshadsuitableuplandarea,but a highwayplatremove d10feetfromeachlot.He
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.