My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
10/11/2006 P&Z Minutes
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Board
>
Minutes
>
2006
>
10/11/2006 P&Z Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/7/2014 4:18:12 PM
Creation date
4/7/2014 4:18:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
P&Z
P&Z Document Type
P&Z Minutes
Meeting Date
10/11/2006
P&Z Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Planning&ZoningBoard <br />October11,2006 <br />Page 8 <br />APPROVED MINUTES <br />infiltrationproblems suchas mold and decay ,causedby weather .Hesaidthathe <br />previouslyhad n ot been able t ofinda contractor that wa s willingtowarrantyawindow <br />that would b einstalledasrequested. <br />Uponfurtherdiscussion,Mr.Janesexp lain edthattheyfoundawindowth atday that <br />wouldworkandtheyareeli m ina t ingthisrequestforconsideration. <br />Mr.Janes statedthatthey didfindsomeonethatwould offerawarrantyforthistypeof <br />installationandthatwiththeoutsidetrim,theywouldmeettherequirementsofthe <br />guidelines. <br />Mr.Raffertyaske d what are asareH ardi e -board.Mr.Knothrespondedthat theentire <br />buildingis Ha rdi e -boardpanel ,s moothwithatexturizedpainttogiveastucco <br />appearance. <br />Mr.Laden askedifthisis moreeconomicalthanEIFS.Mr.Knothrepliedyes,butthat <br />thebiggerissue i smold. <br />Mr.Nelsonwonderediftherewereanyreservationsbecausethere wa sonlyoneoption <br />forthenewlyfoundwindow.Mr.Knoth reiterated thatthisinstallationis an <br />unconventionalwaytoapproachthis ,butthatthecontractorwouldwarrantythewor k . <br />Mr.Nelsonasked how thenewrenderinghasimprovedfromtheold.Mr.Knothreplied <br />thatthereisa morepronouncedpresencetothecorner ,whichnowwrapsaround,and <br />additionalcolorhasenhancedthebuilding . <br />Mr.Nelson askedifMr.Knoth consider s removingthe balconettes animprovement.Mr. <br />Knothreplied thatheisindifferenttothebalconettes,anddoes notconsider theirremoval <br />tobe adetriment. <br />Mr.Rafferty commented abouttheparapetheightsandaskedifthe wingedappearance <br />w ouldbe improvedbyraisingthelowerparapetelements.Mr.Knothstated thatthe <br />direction fromstaff wastomakethi scornerakeyvisualelement. <br />Mr.Trallewashappytoseethebalconieswereremoved.Helikedthewindowswhere <br />thebalconieswere.Hecons ideredthechangestobeabigimprovement.Helikedthe <br />corner,thestrongfrontandthecolors.Hel ike d whattheycameupwith. <br />Mr.Ladencommentedthatitisaveryhandsomebuilding withorwithoutthebalconies <br />andthecornerisstrongenoughthe wayitis.Mr.Ladena skedstaffifthe window reveal <br />isaskedforoften .Mr.Bengtsonstateditisarequirementinthedesignstandards,but <br />b ecausethis particularbuilding isproposedtouse H ardi e -board ,it created adifficulty . <br />Therefore ,thereis noneedtochangetheguidelines. <br />Mr.Laden madeaMOTION to recommend approv alof theAmendmenttothePlanned <br />UnitDevelopmentFinalPlanforLakewoodApartmentstoAltertheApproved <br />Elevations .
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.