My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
01/12/2005 P&Z Minutes
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Board
>
Minutes
>
2005
>
01/12/2005 P&Z Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/7/2014 4:20:10 PM
Creation date
4/7/2014 4:20:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
P&Z
P&Z Document Type
P&Z Minutes
Meeting Date
01/12/2005
P&Z Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Pl anni ng & Zo ni n g B o ar d <br />Jan u ary 12 , 20 05 <br />Page 3 <br />APPROVED MINUTES <br /> <br />10. Parking lot lighting standards and fixtures shall be painted forest green to blend <br />with the natural surroundings. <br /> <br />11. An automatic fire sprinkler system shall be designed and approved by the <br />Centennial Fire Di strict prior to this item be ing heard by the City Council. <br /> <br />12. The church shall connect to the munici pal sanitary sewer system within 24 <br />months of the public service becoming available. <br /> <br />13. The City has the right to periodically review this Conditional use Permit for <br />compliance with these conditions and fo r the protection of the public health, <br />safety and welfare. <br /> <br />14. Right turn lane provided as recomme nded by Anoka County and a left by-pass <br />provided as recommended by Anoka County. <br /> <br />Mr. Laden stated it appeared th at Anoka County had a concern w ith the site corners. He <br />asked what those concerns were and had th ey been addressed. Mr. Bengtson replied <br />Anoka County had indicated th e right-of-way was adequate, however, the site corners for <br />the proposed driveway location was a concern with the existing trees located where they <br />were and those trees would need to be removed with no landscaping being placed within <br />the site corners. He stated Anoka County also suggested moving the structure farther <br />back from the site corners. <br /> <br />Mr. Laden asked how the building was an obstr uction to the site corners when it was 50 <br />feet back. Mr. Studenski rep lied he did not believe the building would be an obstruction. <br /> <br />Mr. Tralle asked if the tree removal should be a part of the conditions. Mr. Bengtson <br />replied that was up to the Board, but Anoka Co unty would not approve this if the trees <br />were not removed, so making this a condition would not be necessary. <br /> <br />Mr. Hyden arrived at 7:01 p.m. <br /> <br />Mr. Smyser stated staff would clarify A noka County’s concerns prior to the Council <br />meeting. <br /> <br />Mr. Root asked at what point would it be required they come back to the City to get <br />approval for regular trash servic e. Mr. Bengtson replied it would be up to applicant to <br />come back to the City if they needed a dumps ter, but they would be required to meet the <br />requirements for trash storage, which included screening. <br /> <br />Mr. Root asked how the conditional use was in terpreted for this property. Mr. Bengston <br />responded this application was specifically for a Church or House of Worship. <br /> <br />Mr. Smyser stated this Conditional Use Permit would be for a House of Worship and if it <br />would be changed to some other use, it w ould need Council approval. He stated a <br />Conditional Use Permit ran with the la nd, not the owner or business.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.