My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
04/13/2005 P&Z Minutes
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Board
>
Minutes
>
2005
>
04/13/2005 P&Z Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/7/2014 4:21:44 PM
Creation date
4/7/2014 4:21:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
P&Z
P&Z Document Type
P&Z Minutes
Meeting Date
04/13/2005
P&Z Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Pl anni ng & Zo ni n g B o ar d <br />A p r il 13 , 200 5 <br />Page 16 <br />APPROVED MINUTES <br />things they believed were approp riate and the reality was that they needed to stay within <br />a budget. He stated they matched all of the existing details and added architectural <br />elements and believed this was the right thing to do. <br /> <br />Mr. Pogalz asked would new m echanical structures be added to the roof on the new <br />addition. Mr. Harris replied the mechanical structures would stay on the existing <br />building. <br /> <br />Mr. Pogalz stated he understood why they did not want to add anot her gable due to the <br />cost, but he believed the gabl e should be the focal point of the building. Mr. Harris <br />indicated clinics were extremely expensive to build, so they needed to keep the existing <br />space renovation to a minimum, if possible. <br /> <br />Mr. Pogalz stated he would like to see more architectural designs, but he understood it <br />was cost prohibitive and he believed becau se they were putting in an entire brick <br />building, this was a very nice and expense pr oposal and in his opinion he believed they <br />could work with this. <br /> <br />Mr. Nelson stated on the existing building th e gable was one-third of the building and <br />now it would be one-sixth of the building and he did not believe it made the strong <br />statement it once did. <br /> <br />Chair Rafferty pointed out that the strongest things designed could be the simplest. He <br />stated he did not believe the simplicity had b een pulled off properly in this proposal. He <br />stated he was not in favor of this project going forward until he saw something visually <br />friendly. <br /> <br />Mr. Tralle suggested on the east side adding an additional trellises and larger windows. <br />Mr. Harris noted they could do this and he would not be opposed to this, but noted the <br />reason there were smaller windows was because of privacy issues for the exam rooms, <br />but because this area was the training room, larger windows could be added. <br /> <br />Mr. Tralle believed this would break up the long wall if they adde d larger windows where <br />the training area was located. Mr. Harris stated he would need to redesign this end of the <br />building. <br /> <br />Mr. Nelson asked if there was anything they coul d to with the roofline to break it up. Mr. <br />Harris replied changing the roofline would probably be more distracting rather than <br />beneficial, but he did like the suggestion. <br /> <br />Mr. Pogalz suggested they go perpendicular with some type of steel design outline <br />similar to the gable to tie ever ything in, which would not cost as much as another gable. <br />Mr. Harris noted they had to determine if a steel structure would fit into the character of <br />the area. <br /> <br />Mr. Laden asked if Mr. Pogalz suggestion w ould compete with the existing gable. Mr. <br />Harris responded a perpendicular gable over 100 feet long was extraordinarily expensive. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.