Laserfiche WebLink
Planning & Zoning Board <br />June 8, 2005 <br />Page 6 <br />APPROVED MINUTES <br />Apollo Drive, subject to the conditions as noted in staff’s June 8, 2005 report and <br />including conditions 8-13 added by the Boar d and was supported by Mr. Tralle. Motion <br />carried 6-0. <br /> <br />VI. DISCUSSION ITEMS <br /> <br />A. Sign Ordinance Te xt Amendment Request <br /> <br />Staff stated the Community Development Dir ector received an application for a Zoning <br />Text Amendment to allow additional wall sign age. This application did not include <br />proposed text, and was therefore determined to be an incomplete application at this time. <br />However, staff has discussed the proposal to allow additional wall signage and has <br />determined that it would potentially support some amendments to th e current allowances <br />in certain situations. Therefore, staff is w illing to work on drafting some text changes to <br />encompass the purpose intended by the submitted application, with the direction of the <br />Planning and Zoning Board. <br /> <br />Staff is seeking the direction of the Pl anning and Zoning Board in regards to the <br />following: <br /> <br />-Should corner lots be allowed to have a dditional signage to a ddress both street <br />frontages? <br /> <br />-Should double fronted lots be allowed to have additional signage to address both street <br />frontages? <br /> <br />-Should multi-tenant buildings be allowed to have additional signage when located on a <br />corner or double fronted lot? <br /> <br />He noted staff would also l ook to eliminate the SC (Shoppi ng Center) reference within <br />the sign code as well as a coupl e of other non-substantive errors that exist in the current <br />text. <br /> <br />Mr. Laden asked if this would include all bu sinesses in the City, including PUDs. Mr. <br />Bengtson replied it would not include PUD’s and those businesses would need to <br />specifically request a separate review. <br /> <br />Mr. Laden stated he believed all businesses should be allowed to have signage on both <br />street frontages. Mr. Hyden agreed. <br /> <br />The Board agreed it was appropr iate to all double fronted lots to have additional signage <br />to address both street frontages. <br /> <br />The Board agreed with respect to multi-ten ant buildings tenants are only allowed to <br />advertise on their ow n leased space. <br /> <br />B. AUAR Update <br />