Laserfiche WebLink
Planning & Zoning Board <br />July 13, 2005 <br />Page 5 <br />APPROVED MINUTES <br />Mr. Nelson asked why would a second sign on a bu ilding need to be sm aller than the first <br />sign. Chair Rafferty stated the defini tion as written made sense to him. <br /> <br />Mr. Tralle stated he had no problem with the tw o signs being the same size. He stated he <br />also wanted to have signage for only tenant s of that building and not a tenant of an <br />adjacent building. <br /> <br />Chair Rafferty invited anyone for or agai nst this proposal to make comment. <br /> <br />Katie Allen, Allure Salon, Spirit Hills Mall, stat ed she rented a corner lot, but she was not <br />on a street, so could she put a second sign on the corner. Mr. Pogalz replied she could <br />not because Spirit Hills had a signage plan as a part of the project and these Ordinance <br />changes would not void this signage plan. <br /> <br />Ms. Allen asked how they could address this with the City. Mr. Bengston replied the <br />owner of Spirit Hills Mall would need to co me in and work with staff to potentially <br />change the signage plan. <br /> <br />Ms. Allen asked if it was possible Spirit Hills Mall could apply for a permanent sign that <br />was not on the Spirit Hills pr operty. Mr. Smyser replied that is not allowed under the <br />City’s Ordinance and the City had made it cl ear that they did not want any additional <br />billboards. <br /> <br />Mr. Nelson asked if that would include a monu ment sign. Mr. Smyser stated the City had <br />made it very clear that it did not want any off premises signs. <br /> <br />Mr. Laden asked if Ware Road was part of the Spirit Hills development. Mr. Smyser <br />replied he did not believe it was. <br /> <br />Ms. Allen stated the problem they had was th at unless someone drove down Birch Street, <br />people did not know what was in Spirit Hill s Mall. She noted they were unable to <br />advertise on the back of their building either. She stated if the City was not going to <br />allow billboards or signage, then they were stuck with what they had. Mr. Laden noted <br />she had the option of going to the owner of their property and the owner would need to <br />work with City staff on additional signage. <br /> <br />Mr. Pogalz made a MOTION to continue the public hearing to th e August, 2005 Planning <br />and Zoning meeting and was supported by Mr. Nelson. Motion carried 6-0. <br /> <br />VI. DISCUSSION ITEMS <br /> <br />A. Village of Hardwood Creek Develo pment Update (1-35E Corridor) <br /> <br />Staff introduced Greg Hayes of Hardwood Creek LLC. <br /> <br />Greg Hayes, Village of Hardwood Creek LLC , gave a presentation to the Board on the <br />Hardwood Creek project located adjacent to Interstate 35E north of Main Street. <br />