My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
09/14/2005 P&Z Minutes
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Board
>
Minutes
>
2005
>
09/14/2005 P&Z Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/7/2014 4:24:38 PM
Creation date
4/7/2014 4:24:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
P&Z
P&Z Document Type
P&Z Minutes
Meeting Date
09/14/2005
P&Z Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Planning & Zoning Board <br />September 14, 2005 <br />Page 11 <br />APPROVED MINUTES <br /> <br />Mr. Hyden made a MOTION to recomme nd Rezoning to R-1X (Single Family <br />Executive) and GB (General Business) and was supported by Mr. Nelson. Motion <br />carried 6-0. <br /> <br />Mr. Lyden asked if it was appropriate to appr ove the sketch plan. Mr. Bengston stated it <br />was appropriate, but recommende d adding Condition 22: The preliminary plat be revised <br />to meet all R-1X standards. <br /> <br />Mr. Quigley stated he was okay with the conditio ns as discussed. He stated he would like <br />Condition 3 struck as there would not be a Homeowner’s Association. Mr. Bengston <br />replied this Condition could be struck because the Outlots were going to be deeded to the <br />City. However, if there were outlots to be maintained, then this condition would still <br />apply. <br /> <br />Mr. Bengston revised Condition 17 to read: All outlots shown on the plat shall be turned <br />over to the City, but shall in no way reduce the park dedication fees required for the <br />project. <br /> <br />Mr. Quigley stated one of the goals they were trying to accomplish in the trail was for <br />consideration to the people to the south and he felt there was more value than just the trail <br />and there is a value to the land also which they should receive consideration for. He <br />stated the upland the path is on had a value. Mr. Bengston stated th is would be reviewed <br />by the Park Board and it would be up to th em to come up with a recommendation for the <br />park dedication fees. He believed the Board’s recommendations were okay at this point <br />and let Council look at both the P&Z a nd the Park Board’s recommendations and <br />determine which the appropriate way to go was. <br /> <br />Mr. Tralle suggested they leave this as written and let this go to the Park Board and City <br />Council for their decision. He noted whether the path went in or not, there where the <br />three Outlots going to go to the City. Mr. Qu igley stated there was never a determination <br />to have a Homeowner’s Association and th is was meant to be a public area. <br /> <br />Mr. Bengston stated the conditions as written were the staff’s recommendation and the <br />Board did not necessarily have to have an agreement with the developer. <br /> <br />Chair Rafferty stated he would like to leave Condition 17 as it was. <br /> <br />Mr. Quigley stated he would like to m ove forward and obtain the Park Board’s <br />recommendation. <br /> <br />Mr. Root stated he was prepared to vote on the conditions as agreed upon. He noted this <br />discussion was not pr ogressing forward. <br /> <br />Mr. Tralle made a MOTION to recommend approval of Pine Glen Preliminary Plat <br />subject to the conditions as noted in st aff’s September 14, 2005 re port striking Condition <br />No. 3, leaving Condition 17 as it was written in staff’s report, and adding Conditions 20,
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.