Laserfiche WebLink
Planning & Zoning Board <br />October 12, 2005 <br />Page 14 <br />APPROVED MINUTES <br /> <br />Staff stated the Hartford Group has applied for a Planned Unit Development final plan for <br />an apartment building with first floor multi-tenant retail within the Legacy at Wood’s <br />Edge project located on the southeast quadrant of Interstate 35W and Lake Drive. The <br />final plan consists of the building plans for th e apartment building as well as the final plat <br />for the lot (Village No. 4). <br /> <br />One of the goals of the mixed use downtown is to provide a variet y of housing types and <br />costs to meet life cycle housing needs that ar e not currently available in Lino Lakes. The <br />development agreement between the Lino Lakes Economic Development Authority <br />(EDA) and Hartford Group, the developer of the workforce housing, includes housing <br />covenants. Those housing covenants include an affordability clause that requires that 20 <br />percent of the housing units built on the development property as a whole must meet <br />affordability requirement. Of that 20 percent, 67 percent must be rental units that meet <br />the income and rent requirements for federal low income tax credits. This 60-unit <br />workforce rental housing meet s the 67 percent requirement. <br /> <br />In addition, affordable rental housing must meet the following requirements: <br /> <br />1. The developer must retain an experi enced, professional property manager, <br />approved in writing by the EDA. <br />2. The management agreement must require that the manager will use resident <br />selection criteria that include evidence th at tenants have income to support their <br />rental rate, rental history showing timely payment of rent, and criminal <br />background checks. <br />3. The management agreement must include a plan for long-term maintenance and <br />repair of the property. <br /> <br />The Planning and Zoning Board conti nued this item at the September 14 th regular <br />meeting, and offered up comments to both sta ff and the developer about the proposal. <br />Numerous revisions have been made to th e plans and are addressed throughout this <br />project. <br /> <br />Staff presented their analysis and reco mmended approval subject to the following <br />conditions: <br /> <br />1. A site performance agreement between the City and the developer must be <br />completed prior to the issuance of building permits <br />2. Issues discussed in the S.E.H. engineeri ng review memo must be addressed to the <br />satisfaction of City staff. <br />3. Operation and maintenance agreements for the site, including provisions for <br />stormwater facilities, must be submitted for review by City staff prior to the <br />issuance of building permits. <br />4. The ‘gull wing’ fixture shall be changed to a shoebox fixture. This fixture type <br />will need to be approved by staff and used throughout the rest of the parking area <br />on this block, if not the re st of the project site. <br />5. A revised lighting plan indicating the a bove required fixture changes, and the <br />relocation of the luminaire near the north entrance drive further east to avoid a