Laserfiche WebLink
Planning & Zoning Board <br />October 12, 2005 <br />Page 3 <br />APPROVED MINUTES <br />4. The ‘gull wing’ fixture (type EE and EE1 as shown on sheet C4.1) shall be changed to a <br />shoebox fixture. This fixture type will need to be approved by staff and used throughout <br />the rest of the parking area on this bloc k, if not the rest of the project site. <br />5. A revised lighting plan indicating the above re quired fixture change s, and the relocation <br />of the luminaire near the south entrance drive further west must be submitted prior to the <br />issuance of building permits for the site. <br />6. The final plat for the project (Village No. 4) must be approved prior to City Council <br />approval of this building. <br />7. The developer must work with staff to identi fy the most appropriate location for bicycle <br />parking within this block of the development. <br />8. A minimum 2 inch deep window trim must be provided in accordance with the <br />development standards for the site. <br />9. All hotel room windows are required to be supplied with uniform internal window <br />treatments that will complement the architecture of the building. <br />10. The first floor windows shall be accentua ted with additional trim features. <br />11. The brick base shall be raised to lessen the gap between the cap and the second story <br />windows. <br />12. The hotel building shall be moved closer to the Town Center Parkway right-of-way, <br />meeting a maximum setback of 15 feet. <br />13. The developer is encouraged to add an addi tional architectural element to the central <br />portion of the building to further strengthen the presence of the corner. <br />14. The landscape plan shall be revised to indica te four shrubs per tr ee within the north <br />planter island (adjacent to th e Interstate 35W right-of-way). <br /> <br /> <br />Mr. Hyden inquired about the trash enclosure. He asked if cars were parked in the <br />parking lot, how would the garbage trucks get to the trash. Mr. Bengtson responded the <br />service vehicle would come in either direction and would n eed to pull the dumpster out <br />into the drive area and load the dumpster there. <br /> <br />Mr. Hyden asked if the trash could be kept inside the building. Mr. Bengtson responded <br />they could ask the developer. <br /> <br />Mr. Hyden noted the location seemed out of place where it was at. <br /> <br />Mr. Root asked why the five-foot maximum se tback was there and should something be <br />changed. Mr. Bengtson responded that the r eason the build-to line was in place was to <br />bring the buildings up to the st reet to create the downtown, main street feel. What was <br />being proposed is almost a residential use of the property and th erefore having windows <br />directly on the sidewalk was not an advantage ous situation. He noted this met the intent <br />and they had worked with the de veloper to address this issue. <br /> <br />Mr. Rafferty noted this was a Planned Unit Development that was recommended by the <br />Planning & Zoning Board in 2005 and asked why we are looking at the spirit of it instead <br />of looking at what the guidelines were. He st ated it appeared they were jumping ship and <br />this was the first thing. He noted two months ago, there was no hotel and now they had a <br />hotel and they were being aske d to look at the spirit. Mr. Bengtson responded that these <br />guidelines were approved in 2004, which was a long time ago and a lot of things had