My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
10/12/2005 P&Z Minutes
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Board
>
Minutes
>
2005
>
10/12/2005 P&Z Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/7/2014 4:25:27 PM
Creation date
4/7/2014 4:25:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
P&Z
P&Z Document Type
P&Z Minutes
Meeting Date
10/12/2005
P&Z Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Planning & Zoning Board <br />October 12, 2005 <br />Page 7 <br />APPROVED MINUTES <br />Mr. Laden asked if that was ruled out for any reason in this project. Ms. Kraemer <br />responded it was not ruled out, but they knew th e City had other restaurants coming in. <br />However, they were open to this suggestion. <br /> <br />Mr. Laden noted this was a pedestrian oriented development and if he was staying in the <br />hotel, he would not like to go through the pool area. Ms. Kraemer stated she did not <br />know how many people would go through the pool area of the hotel, and she believed a <br />lot of people would use the side doors. <br /> <br />Mr. Laden asked if the hotel had elevat ors. Ms. Kraemer responded it did. <br /> <br />Mr. Laden stated it would not sit well with hi m to go through the pool to get to the main <br />part of town. <br /> <br />Mr. Tralle stated he did not lik e the shutters that had been pr eviously proposed and he did <br />not care what Country Inn and Suites had to ha ve as a corporate image. He stated the <br />citizens had to look at what was built and they knew what they wanted. He stated they <br />wanted more brick on the building and while he did not like the way the building sits, he <br />was not going to ask them to turn the buildi ng around as long as they were willing to put <br />some changes in, specifically along the gabled in and the porches also. He stated the <br />porches needed some “tweaking”. He stated just because corporate American wanted <br />something, did not mean they had to have it. He stated they were not going to skimp at <br />this point. He stated if they heard what the Board was saying and made the proposed <br />changes, this would go a long way in getting this approved. Ms. Kraem er stated they did <br />hear the recommendations and th ey would take this back and evaluate the suggestions. <br /> <br />Chair Rafferty stated he did not like the shingled roof and he wanted a standing seam roof <br />to match the rest of the buildings in the area. <br /> <br />Mr. Laden agreed the standing seam roof w ould fit nicely on the bu ilding and while the <br />rest of the building had come up on quality from last month, the roof had not. <br /> <br />Mr. Tralle stated the standing seam roof would fit better in the area. <br /> <br />Chair Rafferty noted they had looked hard at what was going on in the City and he also <br />wanted the trash enclosure to be attached to the building. He stat ed he would not agree <br />with a trash enclosure sitting in the middle of the parking lot. Mr. Tralle stated he agreed <br />and noted the Betty’s Pies had their trash encl osure inside. Frank Janes, General Counsel <br />Hartford Group, stated a couple of the ideas could be put into the development, <br />specifically adding more brick. However, with respect to the roof and trash enclosure, <br />one of the issues was the design standard as to what was allowed and not allowed. <br /> <br />Chair Rafferty noted they have design standa rds that were functioni ng and that he could <br />not see that they would drop th e idea of a standing seam roof . He stated a standing seam <br />roof and the trash enclosure did fall within the design standards. <br /> <br />Mr. Janes asked for guidance from the Board as to whether this would get approved with <br />recommendations or give them criteria as to wh at they wanted as part of the project.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.