Laserfiche WebLink
Planning & Zoning Board <br />January 14, 2004 <br />Page 10 <br />APPROVED MINUTES <br />Mr. Rafferty asked if the fence would be six or seven feet high. Applicant replied the <br />fence would be six feet high. <br />Chair Schaps invited the pub lic to make comment. <br />Bert Noren, 785 Lois Lane, expressed concerns regarding parking. Mr. Smyser replied <br />the formula they used was 10 spaces per 1000 square feet, plus employees. For large <br />events that could pose problems, the C ity could impose additional requirements to <br />resolve such issues. <br />Ms. Lane made a MOTION to close the public hearing at 9:13 p.m. and was supported by <br />Mr. Hyden. Motion carried 4-0. <br />Mr. Tralle asked applicant if they had ever considered purchasi ng Mr. Noren’s and the <br />adjourning neighbors property. Dean Johnson, VFW, replied they had entertained the <br />idea of purchasing the properties, but th ey had not acted on it in any way. <br />Mr. Tralle stated he had a concern with th e addition of future medians and the access to <br />this site. <br />Mr. Rafferty asked what was the maximum nu mber of people that the building could <br />accommodate. Mr. Johnson replied they cold ha ve 300 people in the dance/banquet area, <br />but realistically it would proba bly be closer to 200 people. <br />Mr. Tralle asked if there would be an open re staurant in the facil ity. Mr. Johnson replied <br />there were booths and tables, but it was not a huge eating facility. It was designed for 92 <br />people. <br />Chair Schaps asked if there was anything th at would prevent cars from parking along the <br />service drive south of 79 th Street. Mr. Smyser replied th at was a possibility. He noted <br />Lois Lane was a public street and did allo w parking. Mr. Johnson noted Lions Park was <br />also a block away, which had 79 spaces and while they could not post this as overflow <br />parking, it was available. <br />Chair Schaps asked what was the anticipa ted building schedule. Mr. Johnson replied <br />they wanted to start construction in the spring. <br />Mr. Hyden asked what type of signage w ould they have. Mr. Johnson showed an <br />example of the signage they were thinking about using. He noted the signage would be <br />attached to the building. He stated he be lieved the existing pole sign would be moved or <br />eliminated. <br />Chair Schaps encouraged them to eliminate the existing pole sign. <br />Ms. Lane made a MOTION to recommend approving Amendment to Conditional Use for <br />a Private Club, subject to the conditions as noted in staff’s January 14, 2004 report and <br />was supported by Mr. Rafferty. Motion carried 4-0.