Laserfiche WebLink
Planning & Zoning Board <br />February 11, 2004 <br />Page 5 <br />APPROVED MINUTES <br />Mr. Grochala replied the property that the ro ad lies on was owned by the current property <br />owners. He stated the City had the right to continue to maintain or continue to improve <br />the area because they had maintained the road for so many years. He noted nothing <br />would be changed, except it would be shown permanently on a map. He stated the legal <br />descriptions did not match up with the occu pation lines or the monumentation in this <br />area, so they were proposing to set the outs ide exterior limits consistent with the <br />occupation lines and then set ne w monumentation to these lines. <br />Mr. Kytonen, Surveyor, stated they would fi x the eastern boundary of the larger lot and <br />accept the monumentation as it was. He not ed the properties would acquire land under <br />this arrangement because they are going to give up the extra depth. <br />Mr. Lane made a MOTION to close the Pub lic Hearing at 7:31 p.m. and was supported <br />by Mr. Hyden. Motion carried 6-0. <br />Mr. Tralle asked who paid for the legal cost s for the redeeding. Mr. Grochala replied <br />essentially, the platting was done by the appli cant and they would prepare the Quit Claim <br />Deeds for the outlots, which would then be tu rned over to the property owners. He noted <br />there would only be a charge for a filing f ee for the deed. However, if each property <br />owner wanted to “clean up” their individual lega l descriptions, this would be a cost to the <br />property owners, but it was no t necessary that this be done until the property owner <br />wanted to sell their property. <br />Mr. Hyden made a MOTION to recommend the Comprehensive Plan Amendment from <br />unsewered residential to se wered residential and was s upported by Mr. Pogalz. Motion <br />carried 6-0. <br />Mr. Rafferty made a MOTION to recommend a pproval of the Preliminary Plat, Marshan <br />Estates, Marshan Lane, subject to the condi tions as noted in staff’s February 11, 2004 <br />report and adding a condition that the parkland dedication shall be in the form of a cash <br />payment in lieu of land and a condition that applicant shall provide Quit Claim Deeds, or <br />some other form of conveyance to be determined by the City Attorney to the property <br />owners was supported by Mr. Hyden. Motion carried 6-0. <br />C. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING For Rezone and Preliminary Plat, Legacy <br />Holdings Lino Lakes LLC, Legacy at Woods Edge, SE corner of 25W and Lake <br />Drive <br />Chair Schaps reopened the public hearing at 7:40 p.m. <br />Staff stated in 1998 the City of Lino Lake s, following award of a Metropolitan Council <br />Livable Communities Planning Grant, retained the services of the Calthorpe Associates to <br />design a Master Plan for the City’s Town Cent er District. The purpose of the Lino Lakes <br />“Town Center” development is to provide for the orderly and integrat ed development of a <br />high-quality Tow Center which includes a mix of shops, offices, entertainment, housing, <br />recreation, community facilities, and open space. The mix of uses is designed to <br />implement the principles of the Livable Co mmunities Act and the City’s Comprehensive <br />Plan by creating a Town Center for the comm unity and providing more diverse, life-cycle