My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
03/10/2004 P&Z Minutes
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Board
>
Minutes
>
2004
>
03/10/2004 P&Z Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/7/2014 4:27:52 PM
Creation date
4/7/2014 4:27:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
P&Z
P&Z Document Type
P&Z Minutes
Meeting Date
03/10/2004
P&Z Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Pl anni ng & Zo ni n g B o ar d <br />Mar c h 10 , 20 04 <br />Page 15 <br />APPROVED MINUTES <br />Chair Schaps stated he believed there were too many building on the property, or they <br />were too big. Mr. Schmitt replied they were attempting to save some of the trees on the <br />property. <br /> <br />Chair Schaps pointed out the build ings may not need to be this large. He noted instead of <br />a variance for exterior, they might need a variance in size. Mr. Schmitt pointed out that <br />the Environmental Board was concerned about the impervious surface and the amount of <br />parking available. He noted there would be no parking on the street. He stated he was <br />not opposed to making a couple of the buildi ngs double units, instead of triples, which <br />would shorten the cul-de-sac. He stated he wa s also not opposed to taking out one or two <br />units if he had to. He stated he wanted to leave the trees in place. He indicated he was <br />more concerned with moving this forwar d so he could start building in 2005. <br /> <br />Mr. Root stated it was more than just ta king out a unit or two to make him happy, it was <br />what he needed to do to make it comply with the R-3 zone. He asked for the number of <br />trees and the significance of them. Troy Li vgard, stated there was a tree preservation <br />plan in their packet with this information in it. <br /> <br />Mr. Livgard stated they could make this fit, but they would be losi ng all of the three-car <br />garages. <br /> <br />Ms. Lane believed this would look nice to ha ve seven sets of duplexes with three-car <br />garages. <br /> <br />Chair Schaps asked approximately how much would the units sell for. Mr. Schmitt <br />replied from $179,000 to $229,900. He indicated it appeared these units sold well for <br />newly married and people 55 and older. <br /> <br />Mr. Rafferty asked what were the issues with Met Council if this stay ed R-1. Mr. Smyser <br />replied they would have to go through a Comprehensive Plan Amendment. <br /> <br />Mr. Rafferty stated he liked Ms. Lane’s sugge stion about putting in duplexes. He stated <br />he liked the three-car garage and additiona l parking. He asked this development look <br />nice in the end. He asked for more cr eativity in the architectural design. <br /> <br />Mr. Pogalz stated there were positives and negatives to this plan. He expressed concern <br />about the lot lines. He stated he wanted to see guest parking. Arch itecturally, he did not <br />mind it. He stated he would like everything to fi t in a little better, even if it means taking <br />out a unit or two. <br /> <br />Chair Schaps invited those in attendance to make comment. <br /> <br />Mr. Smyser noted they had received a letter from Arlene and Gary Averbeck, 7855 Lake <br />Drive, who were in opposition to this pr oposal they did not want a multi-family <br />development at this site. They expressed concern about the pond, wildlife, and the soil. <br /> <br />Eric Engelbretson, Lot 3 on 79 th Street, stated they have b een in their location for three <br />years and expressed concern about the wildlife in the area. He stat ed they did not know
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.