Laserfiche WebLink
Pl anni ng & Zo ni n g B o ar d <br />Mar c h 10 , 20 04 <br />Page 17 <br />APPROVED MINUTES <br />were surprised to find out that this was cons idered open space. She stated they did not <br />have an issue with the parking spots, but recommended they put in net lawn. She noted <br />Mr. Schmitt’s people had dug the large hole while he was out of town. She asked if they <br />could do this in a more gradual process. <br /> <br />Mr. Smyser stated he would reexamine the open space calculation. <br /> <br />Mr. Schmitt stated the hole that was dug was done when he was out of town and he was <br />initially told that only three feet would be removed, but more dirt was taken out than he <br />anticipated and they had the proper grading permit to do this . He stated they were <br />working on getting the dirt to fill this. With respect to the easement issue, the plat was <br />done by North Suburban Development and the dr ainage easement was never graded. He <br />noted they had dug this out many times to allo w for drainage. He anticipated they would <br />lose two units (possibly units 16 and 19), whic h would allow them to deal with the guest <br />parking areas and move some of the buildings away from the lot lines. <br /> <br />Mr. Rafferty stated he was not in favor of only removing two buildings and he wanted the <br />density to be less. Mr. Schmitt stated they were under the moderate density requirements <br />and this was an economic issue. <br /> <br />Chair Schaps asked them to consider removi ng unit 4 and the two units when they first <br />drove in. <br /> <br />Mr. Nelson asked them to consider r ezoning this to R-2 instead of R-3. <br /> <br />Mr. Tralle made a MOTION to recommend continuing the pub lic hearing to the April <br />meeting to allow applicant the opportunity to revise the plans and was supported by Mr. <br />Root. Motion carried 5-0. <br /> <br />VI. DISCUSSION ITEMS <br /> <br />A. Process to Address Temporary Signs/Banners <br /> <br />Ms. Lane asked if they should a ddress this at a special meeting. <br /> <br />Chair Schaps agreed they should address this at a special meeting dur ing the later part of <br />the in May or June. <br /> <br />VII. ADJOURNMENT <br /> <br />Ms. Lane made a MOTION to adjourn the meeting at 11:31 p.m ., and was supported by <br />Mr. Pogalz. Motion carried 5-0. <br /> <br />Respectfully submitted, <br /> <br /> <br />Kathy Altman, Recording Secretary <br />TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc .