My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
03/10/2004 P&Z Minutes
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Board
>
Minutes
>
2004
>
03/10/2004 P&Z Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/7/2014 4:27:52 PM
Creation date
4/7/2014 4:27:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
P&Z
P&Z Document Type
P&Z Minutes
Meeting Date
03/10/2004
P&Z Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Pl anni ng & Zo ni n g B o ar d <br />Mar c h 10 , 20 04 <br />Page 6 <br />APPROVED MINUTES <br />of the southern portion from R-1X to Pla nned Unit Development (PUD) for mixed uses; <br />the existing church and the group home; a nd PUD development stage plan/preliminary <br />plat. <br /> <br />Staff stated a conditional use permit (CU) was approved by th e City in 1996 to provide <br />for building the church. That CUP approva l included a three-phase plan. Each new <br />building must undergo a site plan review, but would not require a CUP amendment <br />review. However, the CUP did not include a residential facility, as is being proposed <br />now. Therefore, the CUP is not relevant here inasmuch as no additions to the church <br />building itself are being proposed. <br /> <br />Staff noted the zoning ordinance provides fo r two different types of PUD. If only <br />residential uses were include d in the project, the PUD w ould require only a conditional <br />use permit. However, the church and the gr oup residence is a mix of uses. A mixed use <br />PUD requires a rezoning to PUD. <br /> <br />Staff presented its analysis and reco mmended approval based on the following <br />conditions: <br /> <br />1. The comprehensive plan amendment must obtain the approval of the Metropolitan <br />Council prior to any further City project approvals. <br /> <br />2. The project shall be final pl atted in two phases. The group residence duplex may be <br />final platted in 2004. The ten single-family lots shall not be final platted until 2005. <br /> <br />3. The relocation of sanitary sewer and wate r services may occur with the 2004, phase <br />one final plat because these utilities already existed. Howe ver, the construction of the <br />Oakwood Lane street extension shall not occu r until final plat approval of the single <br />family lots in phase two in 2005. All lots and units shall connec t to city sanitary <br />sewer and water. <br /> <br />4. Park dedication of $1,665 per unit shall be paid. Park dedication for the group <br />residence, two units, shall be paid when that lot is final platted. Park dedication for <br />the ten single-family lots shall be paid with that final plat. <br /> <br />5. The new plat must obtain approval by the Ri ce Creek Watershed District prior to final <br />plat approval by the City Council. <br /> <br />6. Drainage and utility easements around all wetlands must be large enough to include at <br />a minimum a ten (10) foot buffer exte nding outward from the delineated wetland <br />boundary. <br /> <br />7. The applicant must submit geotechnical information on existing groundwater levels <br />and soils in adequate time for review pr ior to City Council consideration of the <br />application. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.