04/14/2004 P&Z Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Search

Pl anni ng & Zo ni n g B o ar d A p r il 14 , 200 4 Page 11 APPROVED MINUTES allowable growth under the growth management policy. The variance requested is based on economic considerations and was supported by Mr. Hyden. Motion carried 5-0. Mr. DeHaven requested the City sign stati ng a road would go through their property be removed. He stated they would not sell th eir property to the City for a road. E. Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Re zone, Preliminary Plat and MUSA Reserve Allocation for Fox Den Acres, Royal Oaks Realty, land east of Fox Road (dead end) Staff stated applicant has re quested approval of a single fa mily residential development called Fox Den acres. The comprehensive plan guides the site for low-density residential use and it is zoned R-1. Th e request also includes an amendment of the comprehensive plan and MUSA reserve allocation. This would allow the development to extend beyond the boundary of the area currently guided fo r development to provide for an additional eight lots. Staff noted there are several challenging desi gn issues including a “ponding and flowage” easement, single access point due to past development design, the growth management policies, and wetlands. The City must consid er these issues in the project design while acknowledging that that property is guided a nd zoned for development, and has been for some years. Staff stated the public hearing is for the comprehensive plan amendment and the preliminary plat. The allocation of MUSA reserve does not require a public hearing because such allocation must be in areas already designed for it under the comprehensive plan. Staff presented its analysis and recommended continuing this item for further information including the proposed plat extends beyond the stage 1 (pre-2010) growth area, the MUSA, the Low Density Sewered Residential la nd use area, and the R-1 zone. It would also require the vacation of a ponding and flowage easement. The proposed requested amendments to the comprehensive plan and zoning map to accommodate the extra 3-4 acres of development. There is not clear ju stification other than to increase developable area. Staff does not yet know if water servic e is adequate. The traffic study is based on outdated road information and should be re vised. A ghost plat must be created for property north of the proposed northern road stub. Staff stated this should have been noticed as a public hearing and he apologized to the applicant that this had not been done. He st ated, however, that there were issues that needed to be resolved and he believed the outcome would still be the same. He indicated the proper notice would be sent out a nd this would be on the May agenda. Mr. Tralle inquired about the roadways cr ossing wetlands. He asked how would the water flowage through the wetlands would be a ddressed. Mr. Smyser replied this was a tough site and they wanted to fill various ar eas and they would need the approval of the Rice Creek Watershed to do that, but they would also mitigate the site.