My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
04/14/2004 P&Z Minutes
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Board
>
Minutes
>
2004
>
04/14/2004 P&Z Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/7/2014 4:28:19 PM
Creation date
4/7/2014 4:28:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
P&Z
P&Z Document Type
P&Z Minutes
Meeting Date
04/14/2004
P&Z Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Pl anni ng & Zo ni n g B o ar d <br />A p r il 14 , 200 4 <br />Page 8 <br />APPROVED MINUTES <br /> <br />TimYantos, Chair of Development Task For ce, stated the square footage would be 3500 <br />per floor (7,000 for the entire building). He stated they would follow whatever the City <br />Ordinance required with respect to lighting. <br /> <br />Mr. Smyser stated he did not believe the C ity would require any lighting of the parking <br />area. <br /> <br />Mr. Yantos stated they were agreeable to adding additiona l pine trees for screening. <br /> <br />Vice Chair Rafferty also expressed concern ab out the two-car garage. He stated he <br />would prefer to see what the City had outlined with respect to garages. Mr. Tralle stated <br />he disagreed with this; that this was a C onditional Use Permit and he did not think they <br />needed to add an attached garage, especially with the use they were intending it for. He <br />stated his only concern was if this were to change to a single-family duplex, but he <br />believed that was a remote possibility and he believed they needed the living space and <br />not more garage space. <br /> <br />Mr. Yantos stated they were willing to do whatever the City wanted. <br /> <br />Mr. Pogalz asked about moving the water ma in stub to and manhole to the center of <br />Oakwood Lane. Mr. Studenski replied that was feasible. <br /> <br />Ms. Mielke asked how many attractive homes were 7,000 square feet. She expressed <br />concern about the size of the building. She st ated this did not fit in the area and would <br />not blend in with the neighborhood. <br /> <br />Mr. Tralle made a MOTION to close the pub lic hearing at 9:00 p.m. and was supported <br />by Mr. Hyden. Motion carried 5-0. <br /> <br />Mr. Tralle stated he was opposed to adding a dditional landscaping. He stated he believed <br />there was sufficient landscaping in that area. <br /> <br />Mr. Pogalz stated he was also opposed to th is because he believed the new landscaping <br />would not survive under the existing canopy. <br /> <br />Mr. Tralle made a MOTION to recommend amending the Comprehensive Plan to change <br />the site from Public Semi-Public to Lo w Density Sewered Resi dential, recommend <br />approval of the rezoning of the southe rn portion from R-1X to Planned Unit <br />Development (PUD) for mixed uses: th e existing church and group residence, <br />recommend the PUD development stage plan/p reliminary plat subject to the conditions <br />noted in staff’s April 14, 2004 report with th e 15 conditions as noted in staff’s April 14, <br />2004 report and adding the following condition: <br /> <br />16. To move the sanitary sewer manhole 4 nor th to the centerline of Oakwood Lane, and <br />also to move the water main to the center of Oakwood Lane with an adjacent stub and <br />gate valve to the west. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.