Laserfiche WebLink
Pl anni ng & Zo ni n g B o ar d <br />Ju ne 9 , 20 04 <br />Page 2 <br />APPROVED MINUTES <br />medium density residential development, NE corner of Lake Drive and Aqua <br />Lane <br /> <br />Chair Schaps opened the public hearing at 7:40 p.m. <br /> <br />Staff stated applicant had submitted a request for a conditional use permit for a residential <br />planned unit development (PUD), and developmen t stage plan (preliminary plat). The <br />subject site is four acres of property at the northe ast corner of Lake Drive and Aqua Lane, <br />adjacent to the existing Marshan Lake C ondominiums. A PUD is required for multi- <br />family development in a shoreland area. Th e applicant withdrew a previous application, <br />so this is considered a new application. No rezoning or comprehensive plan amendment <br />is needed or requested. The s ite was rezoned to R-3 earlier this year, making it consistent <br />with the comprehensive plan. <br /> <br />Staff reviewed their analysis and reco mmended approval subject to the following <br />conditions: <br /> <br />1. Additional right of way shall be dedicated to Anoka County to total 60 feet from <br />centerline for Lake Drive (CSAH 23). <br />2. Right of access shall be dedicated to Anoka County along CSAH 23 on the final <br />plat. <br />3. A new landscaping plan shall be submitted with the following changes three <br />weeks prior to City Council cons ideration of the application: <br />-change black ash to green ash or a native oak species <br />-change Austrian pine to red or white spruce <br />-change Colorado spruce to white spruce <br />-change autumn applause to northern pin oak <br />-three spruce at the Aqua Lane corner shall be moved eas t at least 20 feet <br />4. Exterior building materials must be submitted three weeks prior to City Council <br />consideration of the application. <br />5. The project must obtain approval by the Rice Creek Watershed District prior to <br />City Council considerat ion of the application. <br />6. The City Engineer’s comments in the June 4, 2004 memo must be met to his <br />satisfaction. <br />7. Park dedication be paid. <br />8. All existing buildings be removed. <br />9. Septic systems removed and wells capped. <br />10. Guest parking be installed. <br /> <br />Mr. Pogalz asked if both the buildings located on the prope rty would be removed. Mr. <br />Smsyer replied all structures on site would be removed. <br /> <br />Mr. Pogalz asked if wells and septic systems would also be removed. Mr. Smyser replied <br />they would be required to be removed and he would add this as a condition of approval. <br /> <br />Mr. Pogalz stated there was no guest park ing shown and with the narrow road, he <br />believed guest parking should be required. He recommended expanding the roads to 28 <br />feet, or at a minimum gues t parking being added.