Laserfiche WebLink
Pl anni ng & Zo ni n g B o ar d <br />Ju ly 14 , 200 4 <br />Page 6 <br />APPROVED MINUTES <br /> <br />Chair Rafferty asked Mr. Hokanson to come fo rward. He asked him if they could make <br />alternate 3 work with the additional parking. Mr. Hokans on replied alternate 3 was not a <br />good alternate. He stated when he was at th e meeting last time, he had not received good <br />direction from the Board. He stated if th e Board wanted to change the development, <br />alternate 1 was the best opti on. He stated with alternat e 1, they could get additional <br />parking. He noted it was his misunderstand ing that they wanted parking shown in <br />alternates 1, 2, and 3. <br /> <br />Mr. Tralle stated a lot of time was put on a four-color scheme and he appreciated that <br />they had brought in a four-color scheme pr oposal tonight. He noted, however, he was not <br />happy that they had not addresse d the guest parking on the altern atives. He asked if they <br />could table this to the next meeting. <br /> <br />Mr. Hokanson stated he wanted a decision tonight because of the timing. Mr. Smyser <br />replied the Board still had time if they want ed to continue this to the next meeting. <br /> <br />Chair Rafferty stated if the Board chose an al ternate, it might not be the alternate they <br />want. He noted they could move forward to Council with a negative or positive from the <br />P&Z Board. He requested they look at altern ate 3 and add parking so they could actually <br />see the plan and asked if they be willing to ag ree to continuing this to the next meeting. <br />Mr. Hokanson replied they were not opposed to alternate 3 and they would add parking to <br />that plan and agree to a tabling. <br /> <br />The Board discussed various options as to how alternate 3 could be reworked that would <br />address the Board’s concerns. <br /> <br />Mr. Pogalz noted he did not care how much parking there was, as long as it was <br />sufficient. He indicated they had not said the development needed 18 spaces and if less <br />spaces fit well, they needed to look at that. With respect to the color scheme he wanted <br />the colors to fit with the rest of the area. <br /> <br />Mr. Tralle stated he would be in agreement if each road had a different color scheme, but <br />he was opposed to the entire development havi ng one color scheme. Mr. Hyden agreed. <br /> <br />Mr. Hokanson asked for a little more leeway with the color scheme. Chair Rafferty <br />stated he would look at the color schemes provided to staff and would work with Mr. <br />Hokanson on this issue. <br /> <br />Mr. Pogalz made a MOTION to table this to the August, 2004 P&Z Board meeting and <br />was supported by Mr. Tralle. Motion carried 5-0. <br /> <br />Mr. Pogalz stated he or any other Board memb er would be willing to meet or talk with <br />Mr. Hokanson prior to the next meeting if he had any questions about what the Board <br />was directing. <br /> <br />D. Variance to Side Yard Setback, 6396 Langer Lane, Bacchus Homes <br />