Laserfiche WebLink
Pl anni ng & Zo ni n g B o ar d <br />A ugu st 11, 2 004 <br />Page 9 <br />APPROVED MINUTES <br />was something that was hard to get a hold of and give the City what they wanted. He <br />noted time was important for them on this deve lopment. He stated this development met <br />the City’s requirements and requested it be l ooked at as presented, but he was willing to <br />talk with staff about the possibility of an open space corridor and a trailway. <br /> <br />Mr. Root thanked the applicant for their willingness to work with staff on this. He stated <br />he supported the open space concept, but they had to figure out how to do this effectively. <br />He encouraged applicant to be as flexible as they could be. Mr. Black replied it would <br />assist developers if the City put in the regulations and ordinances what the open space <br />requirements were going to be, so the devel opers had something conc rete to work with <br />and knew what was required prior to starti ng work on developments plans. <br /> <br />Mr. Tralle asked if they had spoken with th e owner of the propert y where the tower was <br />located. Mr. Black replied they had not spoken with that property owner, who he <br />believed was Comcast, and while they could plan for a second access, he was not the <br />owner of the property. <br /> <br />Mr. Tralle suggested Mr. Black contact Comcast to see if there was any possibility in the <br />future of purchasing that pr operty. Mr. Black replied he was not sure he wanted to <br />purchase that land. <br /> <br />Mr. Grochala noted having an access off the Comcast property would only bring another <br />traffic issue at Old Birch. He indicated a second access w ould not alleviate the traffic <br />concerns. <br /> <br />Mr. Black noted they had an expert c onsultant prepare a traffic study and he <br />recommended the City have their consultant look at their report a nd determine if it was <br />accurate or not. Mr. Tralle noted every ne w development in this area created a domino <br />effect with respect to traffic. He indicated the next development to go in would have the <br />same traffic issues as this development was having. <br /> <br />Chair Rafferty thanked applicant for working with the City, but expressed concern about <br />the impact of the development to the west. He also expressed concern about the traffic <br />and the access. He asked Mr. Black to look at the possibility of a dding an access to the <br />north. He stated the residen tial homes immediately to the we st of this development he <br />believed would be impacted by this developmen t. He stated he believed the open space <br />plan as presented by Mr. Schoenbauer was a good one with respect to the western edge of <br />this development. He asked applicant to look at the western lot issue and the access <br />concerns for the next meeting. <br /> <br />Mr. Root made a MOTION to table Preliminary Plat for Fox Den Acres, Royal Oaks <br />Realty, a 50-acre development south of Birch Street and east of Deerwood Lane, at the <br />east end of Fox Road to the September P & Z meeting and was supported by Mr. Hyden. <br />Motion carried 4-0. <br /> <br />VI. DISCUSSION ITEMS <br /> <br />A. Temporary Signage update