My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
09/08/2004 P&Z Minutes
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Board
>
Minutes
>
2004
>
09/08/2004 P&Z Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/7/2014 4:30:39 PM
Creation date
4/7/2014 4:30:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
P&Z
P&Z Document Type
P&Z Minutes
Meeting Date
09/08/2004
P&Z Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Pl anni ng & Zo ni n g B o ar d <br />Sep t em b e r 8, 20 04 <br />Page 9 <br />DRAFT MINUTES <br />Chair Rafferty stated he was in favor of temporary signage. Mr. Hyden replied he agreed <br />there was a place for temporary signage. <br /> <br />Mr. Root agreed there was a place for temporary signage depending on what was <br />considered temporary. Mr. Laden agreed. <br /> <br />Mr. Tralle stated if they allowed tempor ary signage, how would it be regulated. He <br />stated as long as the signs were very shor t-term, one or two days, he might agree to <br />temporary signage. He indicated he unders tood churches and schools would want to <br />advertise their special events. <br /> <br />Mr. Hyden asked if they could agree they woul d have temporary signs with restrictions. <br />The remainder of the Board agreed to this. <br /> <br />Chair Rafferty asked staff to come up with a list of restrictions with in the next couple of <br />months. <br /> <br />Mr. Tralle said he did not want to disc uss this issue if there would not be any <br />enforcement of it. Mr. Root suggested they discuss enforcement process at their next <br />meeting. <br /> <br />Chair Rafferty stated they needed to discuss signs in the right-of-w ay. Mr. Tralle noted <br />they did not need to discuss signs in the right-of-way becau se signs in the right-of-way <br />were already not allowed. <br /> <br />Mr. Smyser stated enforcement was a staffi ng responsibility and it was up to staff to <br />determine how this would be enforced. <br /> <br />Chair Rafferty stated the topic of discu ssion would be wasteful if there was no <br />enforcement. <br /> <br />Mr. Bengston suggested they break down the signs into categories and discuss each type <br />of sign individually at the next meeting. <br /> <br />Mr. Tralle asked if staff would inform the City Council that the P&Z wanted to clean up <br />the right-of-ways and wanted the temporary signs removed. <br /> <br />Mr. Tralle made a MOTION to recommend staff enfor ce the existing right-of-way <br />Ordinance and if staff needs City Council appr oval that the Board recommend to the City <br />Council to enforce the current right-of-way Ordinance a nd was supported by Mr. Laden. <br />Motion carried 4-0. <br /> <br />B. Master Plan – Hodgson Road (49) and County Road J <br /> <br />Staff stated this was an informal item to let the P&Z know about an important planning <br />project. He noted they had begun a study of the area near the in tersection of Hodgson <br />Road and Ash Street (CSAH 49 and County Road J). The study will examine current <br />land use as well as infrastructu re, including road, water, and sa nitary sewer. The goal is
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.