My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
10/13/2004 P&Z Minutes
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Board
>
Minutes
>
2004
>
10/13/2004 P&Z Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/7/2014 4:31:07 PM
Creation date
4/7/2014 4:30:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
P&Z
P&Z Document Type
P&Z Minutes
Meeting Date
10/13/2004
P&Z Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Pl anni ng & Zo ni n g B o ar d <br />Oct o ber 1 3 , 2 0 04 <br />Page 14 <br />APPROVED MINUTES <br />Mr. Hyden stated Mr. Laden’s point was a good one and he believed the simpler the <br />better. <br /> <br />Mr. Bengtson stated the Board could go with th is type of restriction, but many Cities had <br />temporary sign ordinances. <br /> <br />Mr. Laden stated they could still restrict banners. <br /> <br />Mr. Pogalz believed this needed to be more refined and there needed to be a few more <br />layers. He stated he did not believe a te mporary sign was a temporary sign and there <br />were different levels to it which they needed to look at. <br /> <br />Mr. Hyden asked how should they approach this. <br /> <br />Mr. Tralle noted if they took two signs a m eeting, it would take them 5 months to get <br />through this. <br /> <br />Mr. Pogalz indicated the Cities they had looked at previously, appeared to have layers to <br />their sign ordinance. Mr. Bengtson stated a lot of City codes had signage broken down. <br /> <br />Mr. Root stated if they broke it down too much, it would be difficult to enforce. Mr. <br />Pogalz believed this would be difficult to enforce anyway. <br /> <br />Mr. Tralle asked if City st aff had started enforcing the sign ordinance. Mr. Bengtson <br />replied City staff would be working on this, bu t they were short staffed last month due to <br />vacations. <br /> <br />Mr. Tralle noted political signs superceded anything the City put up because the State <br />Statutes regulated them. Mr. Bengtson replie d that was correct and the Board would not <br />need to deal with political signs. <br /> <br />Mr. Tralle asked if those Statutes would give them any guidelines for temporary signage. <br />Mr. Bengtson replied the Statutes were not very specific and ther efore would probably <br />not be useful for them to look at. However, he would gather the Statute information for <br />the Board meeting next month for the Boardmembers to review. <br /> <br />Chair Rafferty asked if there was one thi ng they could look at tonight and make a <br />determination. <br /> <br />Mr. Tralle suggested the look at five signs this month a nd five signs next month. <br /> <br />Chair Rafferty stated they needed to find a way to move forward, but he recommended <br />they only go to 10:30 p.m. for this meeting. He also recommended they only discuss the <br />sign issue until 10:30 p.m. for future meetings. <br /> <br />Mr. Laden asked if they should make any di stinction between commercial and residential <br />property. Mr. Bengston replied depending on the type of sign, it could be used on either
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.