Laserfiche WebLink
Pl anni ng & Zo ni n g B o ar d <br />Oct o ber 1 3 , 2 0 04 <br />Page 9 <br />APPROVED MINUTES <br />would control some of this. He stated he did not believe there would be an influx of <br />development proposals. He noted the City did not move that fast. He stated he wanted <br />the ability to use their discretion. <br /> <br />Mr. Tralle noted no matter how this was word ed, it would be a give and take and paper <br />shuffle. <br /> <br />Mr. Schoenbauer stated these growth controls could be used to the City’s advantage and <br />they needed to trust themselves. He noted they were the decisions makers and they had <br />the option of which way they wanted to progr ess. He stated there was no downside in <br />giving themselves this discretion. <br /> <br />Mr. Laden asked what was the main purpose of the 147 figure other than to slow growth. <br />Mr. Grochala replied the 147 number was the midpoint between the slower growth <br />movement and maintain the existing growth movement. <br /> <br />Mr. Schoenbauer noted there was no develope r that could force them to do anything and <br />it was up to them as to what type of a development they wanted. <br /> <br />Chair Rafferty thanked staff for working hard on this project and noted he was excited to <br />see what was happening at Fox Den. However, he asked if they were possibly being too <br />critical of something that might not happen. He stated he was in favor of option 1. <br /> <br />Chair Rafferty invited those for or agai nst this proposal to make comment. <br /> <br />There were no comments made. <br /> <br />Mr. Root made a MOTION to close the public hearing at 9:05 p.m. and was supported by <br />Mr. Hyden. Motion carried 5-0. <br /> <br />Mr. Pogalz made a MOTION to recommend Option 1 exempt conservation development <br />from the growth restrictions. That is, a conservation development would be subject to <br />neither the MUSA allocation limit (36 acres per year) nor the unit restriction (147 per <br />year) and was supported by Mr. Hyden. Motion carried 4-1 (Nay – Root). <br /> <br />Chair Rafferty recessed the meeting at 9:06 p.m . and reconvened the meeting at 9:14 p.m. <br /> <br />A. CONTINUATION of Rezoning to P UD and a Preliminary Plat for Fox Den <br />Acres, Royal Oaks Realty, a 50-acre deve lopment south of Birch Street and <br />east of Deerwood Lane, at the east end of Fox Road <br /> <br />Chair Rafferty noted they were taking item 5A off of the table continue where they left <br />off. <br /> <br />Mr. Smyser stated he recomm ended deleting Condition 2 on page 8 of his staff report and <br />inserting the following: “No parking is to be allowed on fox Road between Deerwood <br />Lane and the first intersec tion in this project”. <br />