My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
03/13/2006 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
2006
>
03/13/2006 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/16/2014 12:26:01 PM
Creation date
4/14/2014 2:17:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
03/13/2006
Council Meeting Type
Work Session Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
WS -3 <br />WORK SESSION MEMORANDUM <br />To: City Council <br />From: Julie Bartell, City Clerk <br />Date: March 6, 2006 <br />Re: Charter Amendment Petition Process and Timeline Background <br />The City Council received a petition to not allow City Council Members (including the <br />Mayor) to also be members of the Lino Lakes Charter Commission at its September 26, <br />2005 meeting. Council member Carlson had questioned whether the petition had <br />followed the requirements for petitions set forth in the charter. The Council revisited the <br />matter at a work session on January 18, 2006 and reviewed the City Attorney's opinion <br />that the provisions in the charter are not applicable, the petitioners are not attempting to <br />institute an amendment under M.S. 410 as the petition does not meet the requirements of <br />that statute, and that the petition is an "advisory" petition for ballot consideration by the <br />City Council. <br />The Council directed staff to prepare a timeline indicating the process and schedule such <br />an amendment could follow in order to be presented on the November 7, 2006 ballot. <br />That schedule is attached for review. <br />Council member Carlson also requested more specific information on why the petition <br />was found to be insufficient; a response from the City Attorney is also attached. <br />Requested Council Direction <br />Staff is seeking Council direction on the petition. If the Council wishes to proceed with <br />the process, it would be appropriate to place the matter on the agenda for an upcoming <br />City Council meeting for referral to the Charter Commission. As indicated in the <br />timeline, there is a determinate amount of time allowed for Charter Commission review <br />(with an allowance for an extension) and a deadline of September 1 for the entire process. <br />Attachments <br />Timeline for consideration of Charter amendment; <br />Correspondence with City Attorney <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.