Laserfiche WebLink
Planning & Zoning Board <br />February 12, 2003 APPROVED MINUTES <br />Page 32 <br />A primary concern related to site circulati on involves the potential traffic conflicts that <br />may exist west of the retail building. As proposed, a motor fuel station customer <br />traveling north on Hodgson Road will be forced to encounter the backing of vehicles and <br />pedestrian traffic within the retail center pa rking area. This situation is considered <br />problematic from a circulation a nd traffic safety standpoint. <br />In response to staff’s concern in this area, the applicant has submitted a site plan <br />alternative and supportive na rrative addressing this issue (see attached correspondence). <br />To address such concerns, the applicant has proposed to install traffic calming devices as <br />a means of reducing area traffic speeds. Sp ecifically, textured co lored concrete paving <br />has been proposed in two areas within parking lot. While staff appreciates such efforts, <br />the actual influence such paving will ha ve upon area traffic speed is considered <br />questionable particularly in the winter months when they will not be visible. <br />It is the opinion of staff that the circulation pattern to the west of the retail center needs to <br />be re-examined and possibly re-designed to ad dress these concerns. It is understood that <br />resolution of this issue (as well as the impe rvious surface coverage concern) may require <br />the downsizing of the building. <br />Lot Size and Setbacks. While the Planned Development Overlay designation can <br />provide flexibility from the strict terms of the Ordinance, the requirements of the <br />underlying GB, General business District are c onsidered an appropriate guideline. The <br />lot and building performance standards for pr operties within the GB District are listed <br />below. <br />While it is recognized that the motor fuel station, fast food restaurant and office <br />building/daycare facility are con ceptual in nature and will be subject to a future site and <br />building plan review process, their inclusi on in the submission is considered positive by <br />allowing a comprehensive review of the pr oposal and an overall setback evaluation to <br />take place. As shown above, all applicable GB District lot area and setback requirements <br />have been satisfied. <br />Architecture/Build ing Materials. At this time, building details have only been <br />provided for the retail center. The building’s architecture is characterized by varied <br />gable roof forms and column features (wood and stone). <br />As shown on the submitted building elevations , the building is to be finished in a <br />combination of cement- based lap siding (p ainted), stone and faux cedar shakes (in <br />gabled roof areas). The build ing’s roof is proposed to be finished with asphalt shingles. <br />The proposed building materials are consistent with the material requirements of the <br />Ordinance. As a condition of site and building plan approval however, building colors <br />should be specified and approved by the City. <br />Parking. The standards for calculating the o ff-street parking requirements for shopping <br />centers are outlined in Secti on 3, Subdivision 5 of the City Code. For the purposes of