My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
05/14/2003 P&Z Minutes
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Board
>
Minutes
>
2003
>
05/14/2003 P&Z Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/16/2014 10:05:01 AM
Creation date
4/16/2014 10:04:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
P&Z
P&Z Document Type
P&Z Minutes
Meeting Date
05/14/2003
P&Z Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Planning & Zoning Board <br />May 14, 2003 <br />Page 5 <br />APPROVED MINUTES <br />Mr. Hyden asked what state was his septic sy stem in. Mr. Laumeyer stated he had it <br />pumped yesterday and he received an inspecti on report from the City noting it had passed <br />the inspection. <br />Mr. Hyden asked if the septic system would accommodate the new addition. Mr. <br />Laumeyer replied he would need to investig ate this further, but he was not opposed to <br />putting in another septic system if necessary, but he did not want to put a septic system in <br />if the City came through with City water in the near future. <br />Chair Schaps stated he would have the opt ion of hooking up to the City water when it <br />becomes available. <br />Mr. Rafferty asked if he was doubling the size of he home. Mr. Laumeyer replied it <br />would be a 24x30 addition. <br />Mr. Rafferty stated based on the guidelines, it appeared the home should never have been <br />placed where it was. Ms. Gretz replied those guidelines did not exist when the home was <br />built. She noted the Ordinance allowed what existed to continue, but once something was <br />changed or added onto, the current Ordinance existed. <br />Mr. Rafferty asked if there was another option for applicant to expa nd. Ms. Gretz replied <br />it was not possible for applicant to expa nd his home and stay within the setback. <br />Mr. Rafferty asked how old was the garage. Mr. Laumeyer replied the garage was built <br />in approximately 1968. He noted the DNR flooded the lake and at the time the garage <br />and home were built, Lake Amelia was considerably smaller. <br />Mr. Corson asked if applicant had spoken w ith the DNR and asked if the DNR had any <br />concern with the septic system. Mr. Laumeyer stated he had not spoken directly to the <br />DNR, but City staff had. He noted the se ptic system should not be considered non- <br />conforming according to the Ordinance. <br />Mr. Tralle asked if there would be any addi tional bathrooms, or water usages with this <br />addition. Mr. Laumeyer replied there was not . He was proposing to add a family room <br />and storage space only. <br />Mr. Hyden asked at what point were they to deem this a hardship. He noted applicant <br />had no other options. He stated it looked as if applicant had a hardsh ip. Ms. Gretz replied <br />in her interpretation, she was looking at past use and that this property had been put to <br />reasonable use in the past. She agreed expa nsion would be better, but that did not get <br />away from the fact that this property had be en put to reasonable use in the past. She <br />stated while applicant could not improve his property, he still had a reasonable use of this <br />property. <br /> <br />Mr. Lyden stated the home was built in 1959 and many years had passed and he believed <br />applicant had the right to upgrade his home to bring it up to par with other homes in the <br />City. He noted this was in the best intere st of Lino Lakes to allow him to improve his
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.