07/09/2003 P&Z Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Search

Planning & Zoning Board July 9, 2003 Page 2 APPROVED MINUTES Staff reviewed their July 9, 2003 report a nd recommended approval of the project with the conditions as noted in their report and adding the following two conditions: 11. Shall not final plat until 2004 to be consistent with the growth manageme nt policy restriction on annual MUSA allocation. 12. Landscaping sh all be added on Lot 1, Block 3 to create a buffer between the home and Hodgson Rd. Mr. Corson arrived at 7:01 p.m. Vice Chair Rafferty invited applicant to make comment. Rocky Goertz, K-G Development, stated he agreed with the 12 conditions as summarized by staff. He noted on the utility easement they would add language into the conditions or add it into the final plat that the garage would be on the north end on Lot 1, Block 1. He stated on Lot 1, Block 3, they would add landscaping and/or berming. Vice Chair Rafferty inquired about recreati onal vehicles on the property. Mr. Goertz replied they would only be allowed on th e property for 24 hours, this included RV’s, campers, and boats. He noted all homeowner s would be subject to the covenants. Ms. Lane asked if the homes would have ba sements. Mr. Goertz replied all homes, including the townhomes, would have basements. Mr. Tralle inquired about the aesthetics of the homes. Mr. Goertz replied the townhomes would look similar, but the single-family homes would be unique. Vice Chair Rafferty noted they were looking fo r something different in this development. Mr. Goertz replied there would three or four different styl es, with one or two of them being better sellers. Mr. Tralle expressed concern about the homes all being the same colors. Mr. Goertz replied they would be different colors. Vice Chair Rafferty asked for public comments. Wayne Lasky, 6200 Linda Lane, stated he was hoping this area would remain single- family homes and was against the townhomes because he believed they would lead to lesser property values, and he did not be lieve the property was large enough for townhomes. He expressed concern about the value of his property if the townhomes were put in. Homeowner, 6224 Linda Lane, agreed with Mr. Lasky and stated he would like to see single-family homes in this development. He also expressed con cern about the value of this property going down with townhomes bei ng in this development. He stated he bought into the neighborhood thinking it would be single-family homes. Becki McDonald, 6212 Linda Lane, agreed with the previous comments. She stated she had been in a detached townhome development previously and believed they presented