My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
05/01/2006 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
2006
>
05/01/2006 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/25/2014 4:04:38 PM
Creation date
4/17/2014 1:44:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
05/01/2006
Council Meeting Type
Work Session Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
121
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />• <br />• <br />Ms. Julianne Bartell <br />April 25, 2006 <br />Page 2 <br />There is a different procedure that can be followed and which potentially does not <br />involve submitting charter amendments to the voters on a ballot. This procedure is <br />set forth in § 410.12, Subd. 7. Under this procedure, it is initiated by a <br />recommendation from the Charter Commission to the City Council to enact an <br />ordinance amending the Charter. The City Council can adopt the ordinance but the <br />vote adopting the ordinance requires an unanimous vote of the City Council members. <br />There must also be a public hearing. The ordinance does not become effective until <br />90 days after passage to allow for a counter - petition requesting a referendum on the <br />ordinance. If an adequate petition is received, the ordinance would not be effective <br />until approved by voters. <br />In this case, the proposed Charter amendment was initiated by citizens and not a <br />recommendation from the Charter Commission. Consequently, the City Council is <br />following the correct procedure. Should the Charter Commission wish to <br />affirmatively recommend adoption of the Charter amendment to the City Council, the <br />City Council could hold a public hearing and vote on the matter. If there was a <br />unanimous vote to approve, the Charter amendment would be approved subject to <br />the referendum procedures. If the vote is Tess than unanimous, the proposed <br />amendment fails. <br />I realize that the City Council unanimously approved the proposed Charter <br />amendment, i.e., unanimously approved sending the proposed amendment to the <br />Charter Commission for review and comment. While it may be that the City Council <br />would unanimously approve the Charter amendment based upon a recommendation <br />from the Charter Commission, it may also be that one or more members of the City <br />Council believe that the process should involve the voters as the proposed <br />amendment does reflect a change in public policy. In other words, substantive <br />changes to the Charter and the manner in which subsequent changes to the Charter <br />are made are two separate policy questions. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.