My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
05/01/2006 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
2006
>
05/01/2006 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/25/2014 4:04:38 PM
Creation date
4/17/2014 1:44:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
05/01/2006
Council Meeting Type
Work Session Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
121
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Other factors to consider in the use of special assessments include: <br />• State law contains a specific process for making public improvements <br />and levying special assessments. <br />• Lino Lakes can issue general obligation bonds to finance the <br />improvements. <br />• Special assessments are not required to finance the entire project. Lino <br />Lakes can use other available sources of revenue, including general <br />property taxes, to finance the improvement and pay debt service on <br />bonds. <br />• Use of special assessments are further regulated by the City's charter <br />provisions <br />2.3 Storm Drainage System Development Charge <br />As land is developed or built upon, surface water runoff and pollution <br />loading increases. Administrative and capital costs can be recovered at the <br />time of building permit issuance or land development approval. Lino Lakes <br />can require dedication of land for ponding or drainage purposes. The land, <br />however, must be from the parcel being developed. <br />System Development Charges (SDCs) or trunk charges are one -time charges <br />paid by new development to finance the construction of public facilities. <br />SDCs are generally used for several basic reasons (Nelson, 1995): <br />• To shift the burdens from existing development to new development; <br />■ To synchronize the construction of new or expanded facility cap with <br />the arrival of new development; <br />• To subject new development decisions to pricing discipline; and <br />• To respond to anti -tax sentiments. <br />According to Nelson (1995), there are seven factors to determine the <br />proportionate share of costs to be borne by new development: <br />■ The cost of existing facilities. <br />• The means by which existing facilities have been financed. <br />• The extent to which new development has already contributed to the <br />cost of providing excess capacity. <br />• The extent to which existing development will, in the future, <br />contribute to the cost of providing existing facilities used community <br />wide or by non - occupants of new development. <br />• The extent to which new development should receive credit for <br />providing at its cost facilities the community has provided in the past <br />without charge to other development in the service area. <br />• Extraordinary cost incurred in serving new development. <br />• The time -price differential inherent in fair comparisons of amounts <br />of money paid at different times. <br />Feasibility Study A- LINOL0602.00 <br />City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota Page 8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.