Laserfiche WebLink
DEBT SERVICE FUNDS (Continued) <br />While in total the City has a surplus of total resources available over remaining scheduled debt service <br />based on the calculation above, certain individual funds are operating at a deficit. These deficits will <br />need to be funded by future adopted assessment rolls, special assessment levies, investment earnings, <br />transfers from other funds, property taxes or other available means. <br />Factors to consider when analyzing debt service funds: <br />• Are all the anticipated assessment rolls being adopted as soon as appropriate? <br />• Have all the planned financing sources been identified, such as pledged amounts from the area and <br />unit fund or future MSA funds? <br />• Are there significant "prepayments" received from property owners? In the current investment <br />environment, will the earnings the City will receive on these prepayments be lower than the interest <br />rate that was being charged on the adopted assessment roll? <br />We recommend that all Debt Service Funds of the City be reviewed at least annually by applying the <br />above criteria. <br />The Area & Unit Fund is committed to the debt service of some special assessment bonds as well as <br />toward the water revenue bonds. We recommend that the City determine the full commitment of the <br />Area and Unit Fund whenever this fund is used to pledge toward future bond issues and construction <br />projects. <br />Budget Appropriations <br />Each year the City adopts an annual budget for the general fund. Each department receives an <br />appropriation based upon detailed budget estimates for individual expenditure accounts. Department <br />heads have the ability to transfer appropriations within a department. This can be helpful and improves <br />flexibility in meeting department needs as they change during the year. However, such a policy can <br />lead to unnecessary or unauthorized expenditures. For example, equipment purchases. <br />We suggest the City review this policy and consider adding controls on the amounts that can be <br />transferred within a department without bringing it to the City Council for approval. These controls could <br />include dollar limits, restrictions on the types of purchases or getting the approval of someone in <br />administration. <br />Developer Escrow Accounts <br />The City maintains an Agency Fund to account for the activity related to developer escrows. It is our <br />understanding that developers deposit an escrow prior to a project beginning and that certain costs may <br />be applied against this escrow. We noted that there are several escrow accounts that carry a "negative" <br />balance, which represents an additional receivable balance from the developer. We recommend that <br />the City monitor these escrow balances and if they go negative that the developer be contacted so that <br />an additional deposit can be made. <br />Conclusion <br />We welcome the opportunity to discuss the points mentioned in this letter or any other accounting and <br />procedural issues in order to coordinate our efforts with you, the mutual objective being the <br />development of more effective accounting procedures for the City. We understand that some of the <br />aforementioned points are in the process of implementation or may already have been implemented; <br />however, these points are noted so that effective follow -up can be accomplished. <br />(10) <br />