Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />• <br />• <br />COUNCIL MINUTES JUNE 26, 2006 <br />DRAFT <br />90 Consider Resolution No. 06 -101, Accepting Donation of $280 from the Ladies Auxiliary VFW <br />91 Post #6583 for the School Patrol Appreciation Day Event, Chief Pecchia — Chief Pecchia advised <br />92 the Ladies Auxiliary VFW Post #6583 has donated $280.00 to the City of Lino Lakes to defray the <br />93 cost of bus transportation for the Rice Lake Elementary School Safety Patrol Program. <br />94 <br />95 Council Member Reinert moved to adopt Resolution No. 06 -101, as presented. Council Member <br />96 Stoltz seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. <br />97 <br />98 PUBLIC SERVICES DEPARTMENT REPORT, RICK DEGARDNER <br />99 <br />100 There was no report from the Public Service Department. <br />101 <br />102 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT REPORT, MICHAEL GROCHALA <br />103 <br />104 Lois Lane Utility Improvements: <br />105 <br />106 Consideration of Resolution No. 06 -100, Adopting Assessments, Jim Studenski — City Engineer <br />107 I Studenski stated on May 22, 2006, the City Council set the Public Hearing for the proposed <br />108 assessments for the Lois Lane Utility Extension project. An ad was placed in the Quad Press and the <br />109 necessary notices have been mailed to property owners indicating the amount of the assessment and <br />110 the date of the hearing. <br />111 <br />112 City Engineer Studenski advised the project is 100% assessed to the benefited property owners. The <br />113 City will be assessing $186,571.70 at this time. The remaining $209,190.80 has been deferred and will <br />114 be assessed at the time of the future connection. Project costs are as projected in the feasibility report <br />115 at a total cost of $395,762.50. <br />116 <br />117 City Engineer Studenski stated the City did receive two letters challenging the assessment. Ms. <br />118 Tiffany Borsheim at 554 Lois Lane and Mr. and Mrs. Leavell at 511 Lois Lane have submitted letters <br />119 objecting to the proposed City assessment for utilities. He noted residents could appeal if the <br />120 assessment roll is adopted by the City Council. <br />121 <br />122 City Engineer Studenski clarified the City policy regarding projects that are initiated by residents as <br />123 opposed to project that are initiated by the City. Assessments are not deferred when the residents <br />124 initiate projects. The City is only assessing for one utility on each lot at this time. Properties will be <br />125 assessed for another lot when they choose to subdivide. <br />126 <br />127 Council Member Reinert moved to open the public hearing at 6:48 p.m. Council Member Stoltz <br />128 seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. <br />129 <br />130 Ms Tiffany Borsheim, 554 Lois Lane, came forward and read her letter objecting to the proposed City <br />131 assessment. She outlined her reason for objecting and asked that her mound and well systems be <br />132 I grandfathered in. She also requested that the existing house at 554 Lois Lane is not assessed for the <br />133 City sanitation and water services until the current mound system fails. Also in her request, she asked <br />134 to include that even if the property of 554 Lois Lane were split into two lots, the new lot would be <br />3 <br />-55- <br />{ Formatted: Centered <br />