My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
08/28/2006 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
2006
>
08/28/2006 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/28/2014 1:32:58 PM
Creation date
4/24/2014 12:49:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
08/28/2006
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
171
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Wet Meadow <br />Wet Meadow occurs within wetlands throughout all of Minnesota. The ground layer of the Wet <br />Meadow community is composed of dense, closed stands of predominately wide - leaved sedges <br />(e.g., Carex lacustris, C. stricta, C. aquatilis C. rostrata, C. haydenii) or grasses (e.g., <br />Calamagrostis canadensis, C. inexpansa). Forb cover and diversity usually are high. Forbs such <br />as spotted joe -pye weed (Eupatorium maculatum), common mint (Mentha arvensis), turtlehead <br />(Chelone glabra), and swamp milkweed (Asclepias incarnata) are conspicuous. Shrub cover in <br />Wet Meadows ranges from 0 to 70% and is composed of Bebb's willows and pussy willows. <br />Mosses are rare or absent. <br />Wet Meadow occurs on wet mineral soil, muck, or shallow peat ( <0.5 m). Standing water <br />(generally stagnant) is present in the spring and after heavy rains, but the water table is generally <br />below the soil surface for most of the growing season. The drawdown of the water table as the <br />growing season progresses enables the oxidation of dead organic matter that has accumulated on <br />the ground surface from previous years. This process makes available nutrients for some of the <br />nutrient - demanding species present in the community. Occurrences of Wet Meadow along <br />stream courses or adjacent to lakes often have fairly constant water levels relative to Wet <br />Meadows in depressions or basins. On these sites siltation may be important in maintaining high <br />nutrient levels. <br />Wet Meadow tends to succeed to Shrub Swamp communities in the absence of fire, and <br />therefore, there is a Shrub Subtype of the Wet Meadow community. Water -table lowering caused <br />by drought or by ditching promotes succession of Wet Meadow to Shrub Swamps. Wet <br />Meadows on organic soils, like other communities that occur on organic soils, recover very <br />slowly, if at all, once altered by artificial flooding or draining. <br />Shallow/Mixed Emergent Marsh <br />Mixed emergent marsh is dominated by wetland species other than cattails. Bulrushes are the <br />most common dominants, especially hard - stemmed bulrush (Scirpus acutus), river bulrush <br />( Scirpus fluviatilis), softstem bulrush (Scirpus validus), Scirpus americanus, and Scirpus <br />heterochaetus. Common reed grass (Phragmites australis), spike rushes (Eleocharis spp.), and <br />(in some river backwaters) prairie cordgrass (Spartina pectinata) are less common dominants. In <br />general, Mixed Emergent Marsh tends to occur on harder pond, lake, or river bottoms than <br />Cattail Marsh and is less likely to contain the forbs that grow on the floating peat mats present in <br />many cattail marshes. Broad - leaved arrowhead (Sagittaria latifolia) and aquatic macrophytes are <br />the most common non - graminoid associates. Many Mixed Emergent Marsh species are sensitive <br />to fertilizer run -off and other artificial disturbances, and disturbed Mixed Emergent Marshes <br />(especially in the Prairie Zone) tend to convert to Cattail Marshes or become strongly dominated <br />by reed canary grass (Phalaris arundinacea) or common reed grass (Phragmites australis), <br />species that increase in abundance with disturbance. <br />Mixed Emergent Marsh is a broad community type, encompassing all marshes dominated by <br />species other than cattails. Therefore, sub - typing or recognition of new marsh types is likely <br />following more thorough inventories of these marshes. New divisions most likely will be made <br />according to dominant species or basin types (e.g., lacustrine versus riverine), or both. There are <br />two geographic sections, a Forest Section and a Prairie Section. The dominant species in the <br />The Preserve Conservation Development - Restoration and Management Plan 14 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.