Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />• <br />• <br />City of Lino Lakes <br />September 8, 2006 <br />Page 2 <br />Refinancing all of the 1998A bonds as GO CIP Refunding Bonds was estimated to save <br />$213,314 in August. The present value savings as a percentage of the refunded debt service <br />was 4.7 %. This is well above the 3% threshold set by the State for advance refundings. <br />Although this is not an advance refunding, as they would be refinanced after the call date, the <br />3% threshold is a consideration. Annual savings through 2019 would average $21,191. <br />Education Center Usage of Facility <br />The Council scheduled a public hearing regarding a CIP and issuance of CIP refunding bonds, <br />and Kennedy & Graven, Bond Counsel together with Springsted began to prepare for issuance <br />of refunding bonds under the 2003 statute. As the underlying documents were reviewed, we <br />became aware that the Early Childhood Education Center was leased to and operated by <br />Independent School District No. 12 (School District) which raised a question about eligibility for <br />funding under the 2003 CIP legislation. The CIP legislation is very narrow in its description of <br />eligible CIP Bond improvements. It clearly includes city halls, public works facilities and public <br />safety buildings, but it specifically excludes parks, roads, and other administrative offices. While <br />there may be circumstances where recreational and education programs are considered part of <br />the municipal function of a city hall, the early childhood education facility in Lino Lakes is <br />somewhat different. First, it was specifically constructed as an educational facility, according to <br />specifications of the School District. Second, it is leased to the School District, which operates <br />the facility independently from the City, for a term that extends (potentially) to 2011. Third, the <br />school district's lease payments align with the School District's share of the original facility cost. <br />As a result, Kennedy & Graven advised staff that CIP refunding bonds would be available to <br />refinance the portion of the existing debt related to the City Hall and Police Station, but CIP <br />bonds could not be used to refinance the facility leased to the School District. Alternatively, the <br />City could also review the possibility of refunding the entire 1998 debt with lease- purchase <br />bonds through the EDA, as in the original transaction. Because this analysis was still in <br />process at the time of the workshop on September 6, and we could only assure Mr. Rolek that <br />the lease revenue option provided savings in the range of $180,000, it appeared that the <br />hearing was not necessary and that savings may be less, subject to completion of the analysis. <br />Mr. Rolek suggested canceling the public hearing on the capital improvement plans, based on <br />the feasibilities competed at the time. <br />Partial Refunding Option <br />Springsted Incorporated and Kennedy & Graven continued to work to find a viable option to <br />allow the City of Lino Lakes to capture the maximum interest savings available while complying <br />with state and federal laws. The two most viable options were as follows: <br />• Complete the refunding using lease revenue bonds. Present value savings had <br />improved because interest rates dropped by about 40 basis points since the last <br />analysis. Present value savings for this option are now estimated to be $182,665. While <br />not as much savings as the CIP Bonds, this was substantial. <br />• Refunding only the portion of the debt representing the city hall and police building. <br />These two components comprise about 80% of the Civic Center Complex. The GO CIP <br />Bonds would refund 80% of the lease revenue bonds, paying off the longest maturities of <br />those bonds. The remaining 20% lease revenue bonds would be made up of only early <br />maturities and would be paid in full by 2010. Upon final payment of the outstanding lease <br />revenue bonds, title to the Civic Center Complex would transfer to the City. In order to <br />keep debt level, smaller principal payments on the GO CIP Bonds would be made until <br />2010 and then starting in 2011 only payments on the CIP Bonds would be in place. With <br />improved interest rates and selecting the longer maturities with the highest rates to <br />refund, we were able to improve savings. Estimated savings for this partial GO CIP <br />