My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
10/02/2006 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
2006
>
10/02/2006 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/9/2014 12:45:19 PM
Creation date
4/28/2014 2:38:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
10/02/2006
Council Meeting Type
Work Session Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
150
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Nature's Refuge Development <br />Phase I Archaeological Survey and Architectural History Assessment <br />Page 10 <br />The water table was encountered in twelve of the shovel tests at an average depth of 56 <br />cmbs. No archaeological materials were encountered in Area A. Area B encompassed <br />three transects placed at 15 m (50 ft.) intervals. Nine shovel tests were excavated in this <br />0.3 -acre (0.1 hectare) area. The shovel tests were excavated to an average depth of 97 <br />cmbs, and showed uniformity in soil composition. The A horizon was a dark yellowish <br />brown to a dark grayish brown (10YR 3/6 — 10YR 4/2) sandy loam, which overlaid the B <br />horizon of a yellowish brown to light yellowish brown (10YR 5/4 — 10YR 6/4) sand. The <br />C horizon was not encountered in any of the shovel tests in Area B due to the high water <br />table. The water table was encountered in two of the shovel tests at an average depth of <br />85 cmbs. No archaeological materials were encountered in Area B. <br />Area C encompassed three transects placed at 15 m (50 ft.) intervals. Six shovel tests <br />were excavated in this .2 -acre (.1 hectare) area. The shovel tests were excavated to an <br />average depth of 87 cmbs, and showed uniformity in soil composition. The A horizon <br />was a brown to dark yellowish brown (10YR 4/3 — 10YR 4/4) sandy loam, which <br />overlaid the B horizon of light brownish gray (10YR 6/2) sand mottled with a dark <br />yellowish brown (10YR 4/4) sand. The C horizon was encountered in two of the shovel <br />tests and had a general matrix of a light brownish gray (10YR 6/2) sand mottled with a <br />brown (7.5YR 4/4) sand and a light gray (10YR 7/2) sand. The water table was <br />encountered in five of the shovel tests at an average depth of 79 cmbs. No archaeological <br />materials were encountered in Area C. <br />4.2 ARCHITECTURAL HISTORY <br />The 106 Group identified four properties within the project area that are 45 years in age <br />or older (Figure 3; Table 2). All of the properties in the project area are residential, <br />comprised of single - family houses. One house (Field No. 1) was constructed in 1900 <br />according to the Anoka County tax assessor web site. Historical plat maps dating to 1914 <br />(Webb) illustrate a structure near that location on the 160 -acre parcel owned by Rich <br />Gibbs. Although this house may be associated with that farm, it has since been <br />significantly altered by the application of vinyl siding, replacement and re- sizing of <br />windows, and the removal of all original architectural details. The three remaining <br />houses were constructed in the 1960s and exemplify both the architectural styles of tract <br />housing and the pattern of exurban settlement during that period. <br />All of the properties located within the project area have low potential to be eligible for <br />listing on the NRHP. Photographs of the properties are located in Appendix A. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.