My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
10/02/2006 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
2006
>
10/02/2006 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/9/2014 12:45:19 PM
Creation date
4/28/2014 2:38:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
10/02/2006
Council Meeting Type
Work Session Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
150
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
30. Other potential environmental impacts. If the project may cause any adverse environmental impacts not <br />addressed by items 1 to 28, identify and discuss them here, along with any proposed mitigation. <br />Environmental Assessment Worksheet <br />Nature's Refuge Conservation Development <br />Lino Lakes, Anoka County, Minnesota <br />Draft Document — September 25, 2006 <br />Page 23 <br />project will provide public access trails through the property, outside of the built area and adjacent to conserved <br />natural areas. <br />In addition to the above -noted priorities, the Lino Lakes Parks, Natural Open Space /Greenways and Trail System <br />Plan (August, 2004) establishes the City's interest in maintaining a high level of environmental quality and a nature- <br />oriented development context (the "city as a park" concept) by promoting "ecological protection, responsible land <br />stewardship, long -term sustainability, and economic viability ". In order to achieve these aims, it emphasizes the <br />need to explore "combining standard regulatory controls with alternative approaches to the development process <br />(such as conservation development) ", in order to ensure that funding and other mechanisms will be put in place to <br />ensure the realization of environmental goals. The Nature's Refuge project is consistent with these interests because <br />it jointly prioritizes conservation and residential development. Further, it builds the conservation costs into the <br />development funding, minimizing the City's financial obligation. <br />Zoning and Subdivision Ordinances <br />The majority of the site is zoned R -1 Single Family Residential, while 60 acres is zoned R -X Rural Executive. To <br />accommodate the conservation development, the entire project site would be rezoned to Planned Unit Development <br />(PUD). The zoning ordinance provides for the creation of a PUD to allow flexibility of site design for the <br />conservation of land and open space. A PUD allows for deviation from strict zoning provisions to encourage such <br />things as preserving and enhancing desirable site characteristics and promoting desirable and creative environments <br />that might be prevented through the strict application of regulations. A PUD includes the platting of land according <br />to the subdivision ordinance. Platting requirements of the Subdivision Ordinance will apply to the project. <br />28_ Impact on infrastructure and public services. Will new or expanded utilities, roads, other infrastructure or <br />public services be required to serve the project? X Yes No. If yes, describe the new or additional <br />infrastructure or services needed. (Note: any infrastructure that is a connected action with respect to the project <br />must be assessed in the EAW; see EA W Guidelines for details.) <br />As part of this development, public roads will be developed within the site. All new roads will be designed to City <br />of Lino Lakes Standards. All of the customary urban services will be provided as the site develops. Sanitary sewer <br />with a lift station and watermain will be connected to existing facilities. A trunk watermain is proposed for the site. <br />This watermain and lift station will serve this site and future sites as well as providing utility access to existing <br />subdivisions. <br />29_ Cumulative impacts. Minnesota Rule part 4410.1700, subpart 7, item B requires that the RGU consider the <br />"cumulative potential effects of related or anticipated future projects" when determining the need for an <br />environmental impact statement. Identify any past, present or reasonably foreseeable future projects that may <br />interact with the project described in this EAW in such a way as to cause cumulative impacts. Describe the <br />nature of the cumulative impacts and summarize any other available information relevant to determining <br />whether there is potential for significant environmental effects due to cumulative impacts (or discuss each <br />cumulative impact under appropriate item(s) elsewhere on this form). <br />There are no known projects that would interact with this project that would cause cumulative impacts. Background <br />traffic growth is addressed in Item 21, Traffic. Surface water runoff is addressed by the design of the project so that <br />water quality will be maintained, and wetland hydrology maintained or restored, as explained in Items 6, 12, 17. <br />Adjacent land is largely developed already. Development of land downstream in the drainage system has potential <br />for impacts, but with the conservation development approach utilized on the Nature's Refuge project, such impacts <br />will be minimised to a much greater degree than under standard development practices. Municipal infrastructure <br />needed to serve development is being planned to accommodate development in accordance with city policies. <br />All anticipated adverse environmental impacts are discussed above in items 1 to 28. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.