Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />• <br />WS -3 <br />WORK SESSION MEMORANDUM <br />To: City Council <br />From: Al Rolek <br />Date: December 4, 2006 <br />Re: Interfund Loan — Recreation Facility Land — Dedicated Parks Fund <br />cc: <br />Background <br />In 1999 the City purchased a 67 acre parcel of property on the east side of the city to be <br />developed into a recreational facility. The purchase was financed through an interfund <br />loan from the Area and Unit fund to the Dedicated Parks fund. The loan was to be repaid <br />from the proceeds of a successful bond referendum for this project. The referendum was <br />held in 2001 and failed. Since then, the Dedicated Parks_fund has had fund deficit. Our <br />auditors have strongly recommended that the city cure this deficit through one of the <br />following options: 1) Make the loan a permanent transfer of funds, 2) develop a <br />repayment schedule for the loan, or 3) sell the property to repay the loan. The City <br />Council has been holding the property for possible development, and the property is <br />certainly worth more today than it was purchased for. However, Council seemed reticent <br />to sell the property at this time. <br />Staff Recommendation <br />In light of the auditor's recommendation, and interpreting the will of the Council, staff <br />recommends establishing a repayment plan for the interfund loan. An outright transfer of <br />the funds would not be an appropriate use of the Area and Use funds, which were <br />collected to implement trunk sewer and water facilities. The loan can be repaid in <br />installments of $100,000 per year over a 12 year period with a moderate rate of interest of <br />3% per annum (a copy of the repayment schedule is attached). The source of the <br />repayments would be 50% from park dedication fees and 50% from the General Fund. <br />The General Fund has run a budget surplus over the last several years. Staff recommends <br />that $50,000 of any budget surplus be dedicated to the repayment of the interfund loan <br />until the loan is satisfied. In most years, should the budget contingency not be used <br />during the year, a surplus would result. If in any year there is no budget surplus, the term <br />of the payment plan would be extended accordingly. As a result of this plan, there may <br />be an impact on the rate of park development over this repayment period; however, given <br />Page 2 <br />