My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
01/28/2008 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
2008
>
01/28/2008 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/9/2014 12:31:19 PM
Creation date
5/2/2014 2:13:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
01/28/2008
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
108
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
b. That the plight of the landowners is due to physical circumstances unique <br />to his property not created by the landowner. <br />Due to the topography of the lot, the location of the rear property corner is <br />extremely difficult to ascertain and verify. At the time of the building permit <br />for the structure, no survey was required and the property owner believed he <br />was meeting the setback requirement. <br />c. That the hardship is not due to economic considerations alone if <br />reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the ordinance. <br />The structure was permitted, constructed, and inspected approximately twenty <br />years ago and was believed to meet all ordinances at the time. Since then <br />more thorough information has identified that the structure is encroaching <br />approximately 8.5 inches into the setback. While the structure could be <br />removed and reconstructed to meet the ordinance, the cost would be extreme <br />in comparison to the minor nature of the variance being requested. <br />d. That granting the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any <br />special privilege that would be denied by this ordinance to other lands, <br />structures, or buildings in the same district. <br />A 0.71 foot reduction to the side yard setback is a minor deviation from the <br />ordinance, and is not dissimilar to previous variances granted to existing <br />structures that encroached upon setbacks. <br />e. That the proposed actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of <br />the ordinance. <br />A 0.71 foot reduction to the side yard setback is a minor deviation and will not <br />contravene the spirit and intent of the ordinance. <br />PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD <br />On January 9, 2008 the Planning and Zoning Board unanimously recommended approval <br />of the Variance request based on the certificate of survey and findings of fact presented <br />by staff <br />RECOMMENDATION <br />Staff is recommending adopting Resolution 08 -15, approving the Variance request based <br />on the certificate of survey and findings of fact. <br />ATTACHMENTS <br />Resolution 08 -15 <br />Applicant's justification letter <br />Certificate of Survey submitted December 10, 2007 <br />• <br />• <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.