My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
05/05/2008 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
2008
>
05/05/2008 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/9/2014 10:44:50 AM
Creation date
5/8/2014 9:49:45 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
05/05/2008
Council Meeting Type
Work Session Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
103
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
utilities' use of ROW in the City is governed either by the franchise ordinances or in the case of <br />Connexus (and telephone companies), by general ROW ordinances. <br />City Franchise Rights. The City may, but is not required to, enter into a franchise with the gas <br />and electric utilities serving customers in the City. Gas and electric utility franchises govern two issues — <br />utility ROW and public ground use, and if the City chooses, the terms and conditions of franchise fees <br />collected by the utilities and paid to the City. The Minnesota Public Utilities Commission regulates all <br />other aspects of Xcel and CenterPoint. Centennial Utilities and Connexus set their rates and policies. <br />The law regards franchises as a contract that is negotiated between the utility and the franchising <br />city. Therefore, each utility has the independent right to accept or reject franchise ordinance provisions <br />proposed by a city, subject to certain sovereign rights the City may exercise, such as: the City may <br />require a franchise; it may require a franchise fee; it may exercise its full police power rights. The extent <br />of these city rights as they relate to utilities is often the subject of disagreement in the franchise <br />negotiation process. <br />City Options. The City has a number of options here, and full discussion of each could go into <br />far more detail than this memo will address. The following are available to the City and are <br />recommended generally in the order most beneficial to the City. <br />1. Adoption of Comprehensive ROW Ordinance. A city of the size and development of Lino <br />Lakes should adopt a comprehensive ROW Ordinance. This type of ordinance brings all <br />utilities under one uniform set of standards, streamlines the franchising process, and removes <br />questions about the extent of the City's authority over non - franchised utilities such as the <br />telephone companies. The ROW Ordinance is a police power ordinance that does not require <br />the consent of the utilities. It may be adopted unilaterally by the City. It is helpful, however, <br />to give utilities prior notice of ROW ordinance adoption, but it is not necessary. <br />2. Establish One Franchise Form with Uniform Provisions Applicable to All Utilities <br />Serving the City. With a ROW Management Ordinance in place, uniformity of treatment of <br />utilities in the ROW can be carried over to the franchise ordinance. Currently, each of the <br />franchise ordinances is different, and Connexus has no franchise. I recommend a city- <br />prepared ordinance presented to all utilities for renegotiation (Centennial and CenterPoint) or <br />new adoption (Xcel and Connexus). <br />3. Franchise Fee Revision. Currently, only Centennial Utilities customers pay a franchise fee. <br />No other gas or electric utility customers in the City pay any fee. The fees collected from <br />Centennial Utilities are available for any public use by the City and benefit all residents and <br />businesses in the City, not just those customers paying them. Requirement of franchise fees <br />is a right vested in cities and the terms and conditions are appropriately contained in the <br />franchise ordinance. <br />One method of proceeding would be to identify the total revenue the City seeks to recover <br />annually through franchise fees from gas and electric utilities. That total could then be spread <br />evenly and equitably amongst all utilities and collected as a franchise fee with an agreed - <br />upon rate design (e.g., meter fee or straight percent of gross revenue) by each utility. This <br />would eliminate the disparity that currently exists between Centennial Utilities customers and <br />all other gas and electric customers in the City. <br />There will be some issues of "equality" as between larger gas and electric customers. That <br />hurdle can be overcome through dialogue between the City and utilities, however. <br />332569v1 JMS KG400 -3 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.