Laserfiche WebLink
a ees in the franc e ,(.• it collects <br />he franchise asonable. <br />e ` "is no c Minnesota establishing erk is ti f able with <br />ect to a franchise fees'° By way of example, the ctli of St ` til an ` 'est St. Paul are <br />illy Minnesota c posingf, and electric franchise fees as high as 5% of the <br />'s gross revenues derived from •... �: tio.ns in that city' Of course, the City "unposes the <br />7 °lo fee on the City of Circle Pines municipal gas utility. ' Otherwise, the most common <br />range of the Minnesota cities that impose a franchise fee on gas and electric utilities is <br />,queen 2% and 3% of company's gross revenues from operations in the city. <br />iproximately ten percent of Minnesota cities now impose a franchise tee on their gas or <br />ctrie utilities, or both. It,is fair to say that the larger, Minnesota cities and those in the <br />in City Metro Area comprise the vast majority of cities imposing franchise', fees. So it is <br />Memorandum <br />June 19, 2008 <br />extent it is not inconsistent with 216B.36. That is Section 301B.01. Section 216B.36 <br />provides that: <br />Under the [municipal] license, permit, right, or franchise, the [gas or electric] <br />utility may be obligated by any municipality to pay to the municipality fees <br />to raise revenue or defray increased municipal costs accruing as a result of <br />utility operations, or both. <br />Similarly, Section 301B.01 states that the gas, electric, and other public service corporations <br />can be required to pay the municipality "compensation" for the use of public property to <br />deliver the utility services. <br />Franchise Fee as Pass Through <br />Gas and electric utilities are allowed by the PUC to pass through these franchise fees to their <br />customers within the jurisdiction imposing the franchise fee. Thus, the franchise fee design <br />is most relevant to the utility customers who will be paying the fee. The utility collects the <br />fee and turns it over to the city for use as general revenue. In Minnesota, there is no <br />possibility of an up -front franchise fee paid by the utility in the same manner a McDonald's <br />franchisee would pay for a McDonald's franchise. Utilities will not make any franchise fee <br />payments from their own coffers but rather rely on the collection of the fee from their <br />customers within the city. <br />rout to Fee Amy." <br />atutory limit • t: but is t <br />the franchise negotiations, <br />1dating fee it need not have any r e <br />tually incurs because of the utility's g <br />and. Section 216B.36 makes it very <br />+ees may be recovered from t liA <br />335300v1 JMS LN140 -105 <br />