Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />• <br />• <br />torts ... The insurance may provide protection in excess of the limit of liability imposed <br />by Section 466.04.... The procurement of such insurance constitutes a waiver of the <br />limits of governmental liability under Section 466.04 only to the extent that valid and <br />collectible insurance ... exceeds those limits and covers the claim. Procurement of <br />commercial insurance, participation in a self - insurance pool pursuant to Minn. Stat. <br />§471.981, or provision for an individual self-insurance plan ... shall not constitute a <br />waiver of any governmental immunities or exclusions. Minn. Stat. §466.04. <br />b. Membership in Self - Insurance Pool and Waiver of Tort Cap <br />Minn. Stat. §471.981 allows for cities to by ordinance or resolution self - insure or join a <br />self - insurance pool such as LMCIT to provide insurance coverage for damages resulting <br />from its torts. <br />The statute specifically provides a [city] may by ordinance or resolution of its governing <br />body extend the coverage of its self insurance to afford protection in excess of any <br />limitations on liability established to law but unless expressly provided in the ordinance or <br />resolution extending the coverage, the statutory limitation on liability shall not be deemed <br />to have been waived. Minn. Stat. §471.981, subd. 1. <br />The Minnesota Federal District Court has held that even if cities do not enact an ordinance <br />or resolution indicating that they are self - insured or members of a self - insurance pool, if <br />the evidence establishes membership in LMCIT or other self - insurance pool, then the <br />statutory tort caps are applicable unless expressly waived by the city. See Reimer v. City <br />of Crookston and Crookston Public School District #593, 2003 WL 22703218 (D. Minn. <br />2003). <br />The LMCIT policy documents specifically state that although the city may have elected to <br />purchase coverage in excess of the statutory limits [to cover non -tort or federal claims], the <br />city has opted to not waive the tort cap limits Thus, -unless city expressly waives tort cap <br />liability limits, purchase of excess or additional coverage will not affect the statutory tort <br />cap limit Please refer to the attachment entitled "LMCIT Liability Coverage Options, <br />Liability Limits, Coverage Limits and Waiver" for complete discussion on these issues. <br />4. Multiple Claimants and the Municipal Tort Caps: The Holidazzle and St. Paul Gas Line <br />Explosion Cases. <br />a. The Holidazzle case: McCarty, et. al. v. City of Minneapolis, et. al., 654 N.W.2d 353 <br />(Minn. App. 2002). <br />Facts: On December 4, 1998, at the Holidazzle parade in downtown Minneapolis, <br />Minneapolis police officer Thomas Sawina accidentally depressed the accelerator rather <br />than the brake pedal on a police van. The van lurched into a crowd of parade goers, <br />causing two deaths and numerous serious injuries. One girl, age seven, was severely <br />injured, which required the amputation of her right arm at the elbow. <br />7 <br />29 <br />