My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
09/02/2008 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
2008
>
09/02/2008 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/15/2014 3:56:34 PM
Creation date
5/13/2014 1:13:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
09/02/2008
Council Meeting Type
Work Session Regular
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
321
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
A number of key criteria will continue to be the basis for determining the location of new <br />neighborhood parks, including: <br />• A service area radius of between 1/4 to 1/2 mile. <br />• Property characteristics suitable for park purposes. <br />• Connection to neighborhoods via the trail system. <br />• Connection to the emerging Resource Management System (to expand <br />perception of open space at the neighborhood level). <br />• Location of major roads and other physical barriers, such as extensive wetland or <br />lake systems. Trails need to work in concert with the greenway system to <br />provide trails in locations that minimize potential environmental impacts. <br />These criteria were generally used for determining the location of the more recently acquired <br />parks, albeit not always uniformly weighted due to site - specific circumstances. Parks acquired <br />prior to the city's 1992 Park and Open Space System P /an were often based on less stringent <br />criteria and often pose more of a challenge to integrate into the system plan. <br />In spite of any limitations associated with the location of some parks, the overall system plan is <br />reasonably balanced at the neighborhood park level and will serve the community well. Any <br />imbalances that may remain have been or can be largely mitigated through good park design and <br />interconnections with other parks through the emerging greenway system. <br />Interconnection of Neighborhood Parks to Greenway System <br />The interconnection of parks through the greenway -based trail system is of particular importance <br />to the success of the park system. This is especially the case with neighborhood parks, where <br />safe and appealing access to them is critical to their use levels. Lacking these trail connections, <br />any inequity in park distribution will become more apparent to the user because the parks will be <br />harder to get to from within a given residential neighborhood. The less convenient the access, <br />the less use parks are likely to receive. In addition, most of the neighborhood parks are on the <br />smaller side, with only limited green space outside the active use areas. Because of this, the <br />greenway system becomes an important open space component that significantly enhances the <br />neighborhood park system. <br />Areas Where New Neighborhood Parks will be Required as Development Occurs <br />As illustrated on the Park, Greenway, and Trail System Map, there are several areas within the <br />city where new neighborhood parks will be required to service local needs as development <br />occurs. Desirable property characteristics include: <br />• An appropriate location that is as central to the surrounding service area and <br />linked to the greenway system. <br />• Exhibiting the physical characteristics appropriate for active and passive uses. <br />This includes adequate developable upland to accommodate typical <br />neighborhood park amenities, ranging from active open space to play areas and <br />trails. <br />• Exhibiting an aesthetic characteristic befitting a park, which is defined as: open <br />space for active use; a natural landscape with mature trees and quality natural <br />vegetation for its aesthetic and passive use qualities; and interesting (but not <br />excessive) topography for relief and park character. <br />• <br />• <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.