My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
09/02/2008 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
2008
>
09/02/2008 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/15/2014 3:56:34 PM
Creation date
5/13/2014 1:13:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
09/02/2008
Council Meeting Type
Work Session Regular
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
321
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />• <br />• Two specific project sites have been identified. These specific projects would entail eliminating <br />the ditched conditions of the wetlands in these areas and restoring the hydrology to the wetlands <br />by allowing more temporary and /or permanent ponding of water to occur. This could be <br />accomplished in two ways. The ideal restoration strategy would be to eliminate and or restrict the <br />ditch therefore forcing water up into the existing wetland areas. Due to the flatness of the <br />system this would have effects beyond just the project sites and would require additional <br />landowner coordination and assessment of nearby properties. Should the more holistic <br />restoration strategy be deemed prohibitive, then the alternative strategy is shallow scraping <br />(including reed canary grass rhizome removal) of a wide low -lying area to allow water to pool <br />and return hydrology to the adjacent wetlands. The alternative strategy cost - benefit analysis will <br />include wetland restoration credit opportunities. <br />• It is recommended that road crossings of ACD -25 be discouraged in order to maintain a <br />continuous corridor. It is also recommended that field crossings be eliminated or converted into <br />trail crossings as development occurs. In some cases these crossing are serving as rate control <br />features. At the time that they are proposed to be altered, downstream impacts would need to <br />be assessed and a mitigation strategy would need to be developed if needed. <br />• Wards Lake and Cedar Lake are currently controlled by ditched outlets. Management plans <br />including outlet control structures and vegetation management should be considered. These <br />plans will need to be coordinated with the DNR and should include citizen input. <br />• Some stormwater- sensitive wetlands continue to be at risk even with the RMP standards. Specific <br />analysis of their contributing catchments is needed. <br />Middle Creek RMU <br />RMP Future Conditions Recommendations: <br />• Wetlands at risk from stormwater should be evaluated for reducing volume effects in the catchments. <br />• A corridor gap was identified in the RMP; however, this identified gap is included in the city's greenway <br />system. <br />• The small segment of County Ditch 8 that is located in this area will be evaluated as part of the RCWD's <br />ongoing Ditch Inventory Program. <br />• No specific projects are proposed. <br />Sherman RMU <br />Existing Conditions Recommendations: <br />• Stormwater- sensitive wetlands are at risk under current conditions. The City can examine volume <br />reduction practices in the catchments for these sensitive wetlands. <br />10 -9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.