My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
09/02/2008 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
2008
>
09/02/2008 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/15/2014 3:56:34 PM
Creation date
5/13/2014 1:13:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
09/02/2008
Council Meeting Type
Work Session Regular
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
321
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />The evolutionary phases of the community's planning history can be categorized as follows: <br />Start -up <br />The period from 1857 ending in 1955 when Lino Lakes was <br />incorporated. <br />Transition from rural <br />village to growing city. <br />Between 1955 and 1995, Lino Lakes grew from 1,800 to 13,100 in <br />population. It experienced a steady increase in residential <br />development, but little significant commercial and industrial <br />development. <br />Vision -based planned <br />growth <br />In 1995, the city initiated its first all- community visioning process, <br />called 20/20 Vision, which defined initially citizens' views about the <br />future of Lino Lakes. Lino Lakes' population increased by 50 %, to <br />19,700 by 2005. <br />Continued vision -based <br />planned growth as a <br />'developing "community <br />(Metropolitan Council <br />designation) <br />In 2006, the city initiated the Spotlight on 2030 visioning process, <br />inclusive of the current citizenry of Lino Lakes, as a component of <br />its comprehensive planning process. 2006 to 2030 will be a period <br />of continued growth in the "developing edge" of the northern <br />section of the Twin Cities metropolitan region. This growth is <br />projected to progress northward, encompassing Lino Lakes and <br />adjacent communities. <br />The Spotlight on 2030 visioning process discussed in the table above is described in greater detail <br />below. This process set the stage for the 2030 Comprehensive Planning Process. <br />• Vision Background <br />• <br />Lino Lakes is a recognized metro leader in coordinated planning efforts that balance the need for <br />natural resource protection with the need to accommodate growth. The city recognized that <br />significant changes are likely to occur by the year 2030, and initiated a unique process that <br />projects the community's views and plans forward to the year 2030. <br />This process began with an extensive, scientifically valid public survey in early 2006. The public <br />survey examined citizens' views about their quality of life. The survey found that Lino Lakes <br />residents are generally pleased with their community and its future. They see major growth - <br />related changes occurring, but a 70% majority feels that the City is taking the correct approach. <br />While 30% of the community wants no further development, the remainder support a number of <br />development priorities, especially dining and entertainment establishments, full -time job <br />opportunities, and service and retail establishments. Survey respondents felt that development <br />efforts should be focused on housing opportunities for both seniors and young families, and on <br />amenities such as entertainment, dining, service, and retail, present in other suburbs. Many <br />residents also feel that property taxes are too high and do not look kindly on policies which will <br />cost even more money. Even so, there are key issues where residents would be more open to <br />solutions, even if moderate tax increases are required, such as expansion of the trail system and <br />the completion of the neighborhood park system. Although the existing park and recreational <br />facilities were well- regarded, respondents did identify gaps and support further development of <br />the park system. Trails and neighborhood parks were the focus of some discontent among <br />respondents. Residents were very supportive of cooperation with Anoka County in providing <br />additional recreational facilities. Overall, city services were reviewed positively. Lastly, residents <br />felt that the City did an exceptional job in communicating with residents about city government <br />and policies, particularly through the City newsletter, City Council telecasts, and the city website. <br />1 -9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.