My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
09/02/2008 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
2008
>
09/02/2008 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/15/2014 3:56:34 PM
Creation date
5/13/2014 1:13:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
09/02/2008
Council Meeting Type
Work Session Regular
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
321
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
values assessment (using the Minnesota Routine Assessment Method) and a Total Maximum <br />Daily Load (TMDL) water quality model for the Rice Creek Chain of Lakes and associated water <br />resources. <br />Assessment of Development Suitability and Natural Resources <br />Conservation Opportunities <br />As a first step in determining development suitability and opportunities for natural resources <br />restoration and management, remaining undeveloped uplands (and uplands identified for <br />redevelopment) were assessed for their relative proximity and potential to impact and /or <br />incorporate priority natural areas, greenway corridors, and sensitive natural resources areas. <br />Upland areas were classified as to their suitability for development. Environmental impediments <br />and opportunities for development were considered and assessed. The analysis identified <br />opportunities for future open space and natural resources protection and enhancement projects. <br />Generally, lands within the city are classified into one of four development suitability categories, <br />which area displayed on Figure 2 -6: <br />1. Not Suitable — These areas encompass existing parks, open space, conservation areas, <br />and open water <br />2. Marginally Suitable — These areas encompass lands that include two (2) or more <br />sensitive natural resources areas. Sensitive natural resource areas include: high priority <br />wetlands, hydric soils and lower quality wetlands, unique habitat, and the predicted 100 - <br />yr rainfall event extent. <br />3. Moderately Suitable — These areas encompass lands that include one (1) sensitive <br />natural resource area (see description above) <br />4. Highly Suitable — The areas encompass lands that do not include any sensitive natural <br />resource areas (see description above) <br />The suitability analysis was used to inform the comprehensive plan update process and will help <br />guide future development within the City. The suitability analysis was refined throughout the <br />process as new information was made available. The initial suitability analysis was used to fully <br />incorporate natural resource information into the land use alternatives analysis that resulted in <br />the proposed land use plan map presented in Chapter 3. Likewise, the refined suitability analysis <br />was used to update important elements of the 2004 Parks, Natural Open Space /Greenways, and <br />Trail System Plan. These updates are presented in this chapter. Lastly, the suitability analysis <br />will be referred to as the city reviews future development applications within or adjacent to <br />environmentally sensitive areas (see Figure 2 -6). <br />• <br />• <br />• <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.