My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
10/06/2008 Council Packet (2)
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
2008
>
10/06/2008 Council Packet (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/15/2014 12:33:13 PM
Creation date
5/15/2014 9:52:35 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
10/06/2008
Council Meeting Type
Work Session Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
94
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
How to Maintain Streets with the Least Burden to Taxpayers <br />While the Home Rule Charter has, indeed, provided every resident of Lino Lakes a vote <br />on whether or not to fix city streets, many residents don't understand some of the key <br />considerations in fixing roads. Here's a quick primer. <br />Do the Roads Need to Be Fixed? <br />Think: Minnesota winters. While roads in California last seemingly forever, ours face severe <br />weather swings and involve salt, bitter cold, intense heat, tremendous moisture, and SUVs <br />that grow bigger and heavier monthly. Unless there is a wise, consistent, ongoing <br />maintenance plan, the cost to eventually fix them will be enormous. <br />How Do Most Cities Pay for Roads? <br />Most cities consider road maintenance to be part of "public improvement " — something <br />owned by all residents and benefiting all residents. As such, city governments oversee the <br />maintenance of streets. Part of the leaders' stewardship of the city is ensuring streets are <br />maintained. Under the guidance of Minnesota Statute, Chapter 429, most cities approach <br />public financing of streets as part of a four -part process: <br />1. Determine the most fiscally prudent way to maintain the street and assign a cost; <br />2. Assess a portion of the costs to property owners who benefit the most; <br />3. Spread remaining costs evenly among all remaining taxpayers; <br />4. Minimize the use of city -wide property taxes. <br />How Does Our City Pay for Roads? <br />For routine maintenance, the city has a general fund it taps for repairs. When a street has <br />reached the end of its useful life, or needs to be reconstructed for whatever other reason, <br />usually the costs are too high for the general fund. In this case, our city must first ask voters <br />to agree to a special assessment to cover the cost of a project. Only once in 12 years have <br />residents agreed to pay for a public improvement with a special assessment. This record of <br />public referenda defeat is one reason so many of our roads are in such poor condition. <br />Fast Facts <br />The citizens of Lino Lakes own 84 <br />miles of paved roads valued at 590 <br />million and representing a significant <br />asset for the city. 11 miles of those <br />roads now need to be reconstructed <br />and more will continue to deteriorate <br />each year the city is unable to <br />initiate a pavement repair plan. <br />Did You Know? <br />The city has financing methods avail- <br />able to reconstruct roads today that <br />don't require a referendum. How- <br />ever, under one option, property <br />taxes assessed to all citizens would <br />immediately increase by nearly 20 %- <br />-far higher than if the city adopted <br />Minnesota Statute, Chapter 429. <br />Another option involving recon- <br />struction bonds would require im- <br />mense complexity and even further <br />delays than we experience today. <br />League of Minnesota Cities' <br />Special Assessment Guide for All Citizens <br />All communities in Minnesota except for <br />Lino Lakes allow city managers the authority <br />to assess the cost of maintaining and <br />repairing local streets and roads without <br />a citywide referendum. In the spirit of <br />transparency, accountability, and fairness <br />many cities follow the League of <br />Minnesota's Special Assessment Guide to <br />ensure infrastructure projects are necessary, <br />fair, and welcome by affected citizens. <br />The Guide outlines a step - <br />by -step process — <br />explicit under MN <br />Statute Chapter <br />429 —for citizens <br />to register <br />objections to <br />city- driven <br />infrastructure <br />improvement <br />LEAGUE OF <br />MINNESOTA <br />CITIES <br />projects that involve special assessments. <br />The three steps the Guide counsels are: <br />• Challenges to the feasibility study; <br />• Requesting an assessment waiver; <br />• Legal appeal of the assessment taken to <br />district court. <br />Although the city may still move forward <br />with a maintenance project under Chapter <br />429 despite objections, citizens will always <br />have the right to vote elected officials out <br />of office if they continually overlook citizen <br />objections. <br />A copy of the League of Minnesota Cities <br />Guide to Special Assessments may be <br />obtained at Lino Lakes City Hall. <br />5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.