Laserfiche WebLink
City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota <br />Management Report, Page 34 <br />There are two basic factors which contribute to increased billings from the MCWS: <br />1. Changes in use of the system. The MCWS has increased the 1995 estimated flow for <br />the City of Lino Lakes by 11 %. <br />2. Increased cost to process sewage. The MCWS's cost to process (per million gallons) <br />increased to an estimated $1,276 in 1995 from an estimated $1,243 in 1994. This <br />represents an increase of 2.6 %. <br />The combination of the above factors has increased the City's estimated cost in 1995 by 15 %. <br />During 1988 the City adopted a policy of charging a water user fee for core system <br />improvements. The add -on charge is calculated based on a fixed amount per quarter. This charge <br />is collected as revenue of the water enterprise fund along with normal charges. Such amounts are <br />then transferred to the Area and Unit Charge Fund which financed (or will finance) such <br />improvements. During 1994 the City transferred $183,667 to the Area and Unit Charge Fund. <br />The area and unit charge fund transferred $91,548 to the water enterprise fund for debt service <br />payments on the revenue bond issue to construct the water tower. <br />The water and sewer operations reflect retained earnings of $276,830 and $173,400, <br />respectively. Retained earnings should not be equated with fund balance. The Utility operations <br />are financed by user fees which are billed and collected only after the services are provided. This <br />creates a timing difference between payment of expenses and collection of service charges (i.e., <br />accounts receivable). Additionally, certain costs are paid in advance (prepaid expenses) and/or <br />supply items are purchased in advance (i.e., inventories). These items create a timing difference <br />between payment of expenses and cost recovery through service changes. Those items (commonly <br />referred to as Working Capital needs) are noncash assets. <br />