Laserfiche WebLink
Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council <br />City of Lino Lakes <br />Page 2 <br />Auditor Comments <br />Use of repurchase agreements and financial statement disclosure under GASB 3 <br />For its main depository account, the city uses overnight repurchase agreements that have one -day <br />maturities. The use of "overnight" repurchase agreements can be an efficient and effective way to <br />increase the yield on cash balances. Repurchase agreements are similar to collateralized deposits, <br />they both involve giving cash to another party who promises to return the cash plus interest and <br />pledges securities as collateral for the promise. <br />Govemment entities may enter into repurchase agreements with banks. Banks are subject to the <br />regulatory oversight of several government agencies but are not subject to the Federal Bankruptcy <br />Code. This means that in the event of a bankruptcy filing by the bank the repurchase agreement may <br />not be protected and such assets could be used to satisfy creditors. <br />In addition, repurchase agreements are not covered by insurance. Repurchase agreements are not <br />_ covered by FDIC insurance because they are not considered deposits. Similarly, SIPC insurance does <br />not extend to repurchase agreements. Because the repurchase agreements are not insured, nor are <br />they investments held by the city, such investments are considered a category 3 custodial risk <br />investment under Government Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 3. <br />When entering into repurchase agreements it is important to know the company in which the <br />repurchase agreement is invested and to become satisfied with the dealer's creditworthiness. <br />Computerization of special assessment records. <br />During the course of the audit a significant amount of time was required to be spent (by staff and <br />auditors) updating the City's special assessment records. <br />There are many items that must be tracked throughout the special assessment process; the adopted <br />assessment roll, the annual special assessment levy (principal and interest), property owner <br />prepayments and remaining deferred balances. The current method of tracking this process is <br />predominately done manually and requires manual tracking and verifying of assessments. <br />Because of the importance and dollar amount of the special assessments, the number of parcels to be <br />accounted for and number of separate assessment rolls for each parcel, we recommend that the city <br />investigate computerizing the special assessment records. This will not only assist in maintaining the <br />deferred receivable balances and the certification of the annual spread levy but it will also prove <br />valuable in the certification of payoff balances for individual property owners. <br />Centralization of Bid Records <br />Minnesota Statutes require that specific bidding procedures be followed for contracts entered into by <br />the City meeting certain dollar value criteria. One of the requirements is that documentation of the <br />bidding process be retained. During the course of the audit, it was noted that certain supporting <br />documentation for the contracts selected for testing was unavailable. We suggest the bidding process <br />be centralized and appropriate procedures be implemented or reviewed to ensure compliance with <br />Statutes and that proper documentation is retained. <br />