Laserfiche WebLink
City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota <br />Management Report, Page 23 <br />Debt Service Funds should be evaluated at least annually. The following chart summarizes <br />steps to consider. <br />Condition A <br />Fund balance plus <br />deferred revenue <br />meets or exceeds <br />bonds payable. <br />Cautions <br />Condition B <br />11. Is the City experiencing favorable <br />collection rates for special assess- <br />ments? <br />2. Are anticipated investment interest <br />rates earned on prepayments ade- <br />quate to replace assessment interest? <br />3. Is the timing of receipts sufficient to <br />meet bonded debt payments as <br />they become due? <br />4. Are significant portions of assess- <br />ments not scheduled for collection <br />(green acres, tax forfeit,etc.)? <br />5. Is arbitrage or negative arbitrage <br />an issue? <br />1. Are sufficient future assets <br />scheduled (such as property taxes) <br />to meet bonded debt payments? <br />2. Are cash assets sufficient to <br />generate investment earnins? <br />3. Are transfers or other funding <br />sources available? <br />4. Are there future assets to pledge <br />such as assessments, MSA allot- <br />ments, etc <br />Conclusion 1 <br />The debt service find <br />is clearly IIat adequately <br />funded. Plan for altern- <br />ative funding (taxes, <br />transfers, other sources). <br />Conclusion 2 <br />Variables and possible <br />outcomes are too diverse. <br />Prepare projections to <br />analyze possible <br />scenarios and options. <br />Conclusion 3 <br />Improvement Bonds of 1986 <br />The Improvement Bonds of 1986 were issued to refinance the Improvement Bonds of 1982 <br />and to finance the Sunset Road Improvements. These bonds were called for redemption and <br />prepayment on February 1, 1992. <br />