Laserfiche WebLink
City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota <br />Management Report, Page 33 <br />The tax increment plan also includes an annual administrative fee. Minnesota Statutes 469.176 <br />Subd. 3 reads as follows: <br />Limitation on administrative expenses. (a) For districts for which certification <br />was requested before August 1, 1979, or after June 30, 1982, no tax increment shall be <br />used to pay any administrative expenses for a project which exceed ten percent of the total <br />tax increment expenditures authorized by the tax increment financing plan or the total tax <br />increment expenditures for the project, whichever is less. <br />We recommend that the City determine if this fee will be received as an interfund charge of the <br />General Fund or if applicable expenses will be allocated to the appropriate Capital Project Fund. <br />Tax increment districts often generate surplus amounts over the anticipated receipts. The 1988 <br />legislative session reduced the probability of such excesses by requiring excess amounts caused by <br />tax rate increases to be spread to all taxing authorities. Excess amounts may still be generated from <br />captured values in excess of anticipated values. As such, we recommend that if tax increment <br />bonds are sold that the City: <br />1. Include a bond provision which allows tax increment collections to be receipted to the <br />Economic Development #1 Capital Project Fund. <br />2. Approve and transfer as needed to the Debt Service Fund. <br />The above procedures will provide the City greater options if surpluses develop. Such <br />surpluses may then be allocated to the other improvements within the District as allowed by the <br />(amended) plan. <br />The City received initial tax increments of $49,808 in 1988. In 1990 and 1991 the City had tax <br />increment collections of $130,069 and $191,326 respectively. Additionally, this fund had as of <br />December 31, 1991, $67,103 of delinquent tax increments. <br />